Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37844311›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2023

Telemedicine Versus In-Person Primary Care: Treatment and Follow-up Visits.

Mary Reed, Jie Huang, Madeline Somers, Loretta Hsueh, Ilana Graetz, Andrea Millman, Emilie Muelly, Anjali Gopalan

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary ReedKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California (M.R., J.H., M.S., A.M., A.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-8203-1016
Jie HuangKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California (M.R., J.H., M.S., A.M., A.G.).
Madeline SomersKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California (M.R., J.H., M.S., A.M., A.G.).ORCID 0000-0003-4683-8661
Loretta HsuehKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California, and University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (L.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-4169-0824
Ilana GraetzEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia (I.G.).ORCID 0000-0003-3664-5815
Andrea MillmanKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California (M.R., J.H., M.S., A.M., A.G.).
Emilie MuellyThe Permanente Medical Group, Santa Clara, California (E.M.).
Anjali GopalanKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California (M.R., J.H., M.S., A.M., A.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-9300-1154
Kaiser Permanente · USColorado Permanente Medical Group · USEmory University · US

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Patient choice of telemedicine encountersR01HS025189 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REED, MARY · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025189AHRQ HHS R01HS25189NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeyond initial COVID-19 pandemic emergency expansions of telemedicine use, it is unclear how well primary care telemedicine addresses patients' needs.

objectiveTo compare treatment and follow-up visits (office, emergency department, hospitalization) between primary care video or telephone telemedicine and in-person office visits.

designRetrospective design based on administrative and electronic health record (EHR) data.

settingLarge, integrated health care delivery system with more than 1300 primary care providers, between April 2021 and December 2021 (including the COVID-19 pandemic Delta wave). PATIENTS: 1 589 014 adult patients; 26.5% were aged 65 years or older, 54.9% were female, 22.2% were Asian, 7.4% were Black, 22.3% were Hispanic, 46.5% were White, 21.5% lived in neighborhoods with lower socioeconomic status, and 31.8% had a chronic health condition. MEASUREMENTS: Treatment outcomes included medication or antibiotic prescribing and laboratory or imaging ordering. Follow-up visits included in-person visits to the primary care office or emergency department or hospitalization within 7 days. Outcomes were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics overall and stratified by clinical area (abdominal pain, gastrointestinal concerns, back pain, dermatologic concerns, musculoskeletal pain, routine care, hypertension or diabetes, and mental health).

resultsOf 2 357 598 primary care visits, 50.8% used telemedicine (19.5% video and 31.3% telephone). After adjustment, medications were prescribed in 46.8% of office visits, 38.4% of video visits, and 34.6% of telephone visits. After the visit, 1.3% of in-person visits, 6.2% of video visits, and 7.6% of telephone visits had a 7-day return in-person primary care visit; 1.6% of in-person visits, 1.8% of video visits, and 2.1% of telephone visits were followed by an emergency department visit. Differences in follow-up office visits were largest after index office versus telephone visits for acute pain conditions and smallest for mental health. LIMITATIONS: In the study setting, telemedicine is fully integrated with ongoing EHRs and with clinicians, and the study examines an insured population during the late COVID-19 pandemic period. Observational comparison lacks detailed severity or symptom measures. Follow-up was limited to 7 days. Clinical area categorization uses diagnosis code rather than symptom.

conclusionIn-person return visits were somewhat higher after telemedicine compared with in-person primary care visits but varied by specific clinical condition. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Indexed as

COVID-19Musculoskeletal PainTelemedicineAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePandemicsPrimary Health CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37844311
PMCPMC11382601
OpenAlexW4387666343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.