Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37844248›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

US climate policy yields water quality cobenefits in the Mississippi Basin and Gulf of Mexico.

Shan Zuidema, Jing Liu, Maksym G Chepeliev, David R Johnson, Uris Lantz C Baldos, Steve Frolking, Christopher J Kucharik, Wilfred M Wollheim, Thomas W Hertel

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shan ZuidemaEarth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.ORCID 0000-0002-9433-0769
Jing LiuDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.ORCID 0000-0002-6258-0958
Maksym G ChepelievDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
David R JohnsonDepartment of Political Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.ORCID 0000-0002-2364-340X
Uris Lantz C BaldosDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.ORCID 0000-0003-3893-0839
Steve FrolkingEarth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.
Christopher J KucharikDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0002-0400-758X
Wilfred M WollheimEarth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.ORCID 0000-0002-5009-3212
Thomas W HertelDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.ORCID 0000-0002-7179-7630

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1855937USDA | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) 0225006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We utilize a coupled economy-agroecology-hydrology modeling framework to capture the cascading impacts of climate change mitigation policy on agriculture and the resulting water quality cobenefits. We analyze a policy that assigns a range of United States government's social cost of carbon estimates ($51, $76, and $152/ton of CO

Indexed as

agricultural economicsbiogeochemistrycarbon priceclimate mitigationmarine hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID37844248
PMCPMC10614783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.