Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37844243›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems.

Michael L Wong, Carol E Cleland, Daniel Arend, Stuart Bartlett, H James Cleaves, Heather Demarest, Anirudh Prabhu, Jonathan I Lunine, Robert M Hazen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Organic geochemical evidence for life in Archean rocks identified by pyrolysis-GC-MS and supervised machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Evolutionary features in a minimal physical system: Diversity, selection, growth, inheritance, and adaptation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Complexity myths and the misappropriation of evolutionary theory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael L WongEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015.ORCID 0000-0001-8212-3036
Carol E ClelandDepartment of Philosophy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.ORCID 0000-0002-8703-7580
Daniel ArendDepartment of Philosophy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
Stuart BartlettDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0001-5680-476X
H James CleavesEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-0654
Heather DemarestDepartment of Philosophy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
Anirudh PrabhuEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-6084
Jonathan I LunineDepartment of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.ORCID 0000-0003-2279-4131
Robert M HazenEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015.ORCID 0000-0003-4163-8644

Funding

Carnegie Institution for Science (CIS) N/AJohn Templeton Foundation (JTF) 61783McDonald Agape Foundation (AGAPE) N/ANASA | NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI) 80NSSC18M0093National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) HST-HF2-51521.001-A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical laws-such as the laws of motion, gravity, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics-codify the general behavior of varied macroscopic natural systems across space and time. We propose that an additional, hitherto-unarticulated law is required to characterize familiar macroscopic phenomena of our complex, evolving universe. An important feature of the classical laws of physics is the conceptual equivalence of specific characteristics shared by an extensive, seemingly diverse body of natural phenomena. Identifying potential equivalencies among disparate phenomena-for example, falling apples and orbiting moons or hot objects and compressed springs-has been instrumental in advancing the scientific understanding of our world through the articulation of laws of nature. A pervasive wonder of the natural world is the evolution of varied systems, including stars, minerals, atmospheres, and life. These evolving systems appear to be conceptually equivalent in that they display three notable attributes: 1) They form from numerous components that have the potential to adopt combinatorially vast numbers of different configurations; 2) processes exist that generate numerous different configurations; and 3) configurations are preferentially selected based on function. We identify universal concepts of selection-static persistence, dynamic persistence, and novelty generation-that underpin function and drive systems to evolve through the exchange of information between the environment and the system. Accordingly, we propose a "law of increasing functional information": The functional information of a system will increase (i.e., the system will evolve) if many different configurations of the system undergo selection for one or more functions.

Indexed as

evolving systemsfunctional informationnatural lawsselectionTitan

Identifiers

PMID37844243
PMCPMC10614609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.