Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37844068›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023

Statistical Approaches to Study Exposome-Health Associations in the Context of Repeated Exposure Data: A Simulation Study.

Charline Warembourg, Augusto Anguita-Ruiz, Valérie Siroux, Rémy Slama, Martine Vrijheid, Lorenzo Richiardi, Xavier Basagaña

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Relevance and challenges of exposome studies for environmental health research.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Machine learning in causal inference for epidemiology.European journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charline WarembourgUniv Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)─UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Augusto Anguita-RuizISGlobal, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Valérie SirouxTeam of Environmental Epidemiology Applied to Development and Respiratory Health, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CNRS, 38700 La Tronche, France.
Rémy SlamaTeam of Environmental Epidemiology Applied to Development and Respiratory Health, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CNRS, 38700 La Tronche, France.
Martine VrijheidISGlobal, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Lorenzo RichiardiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO-Piemonte, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Xavier BasagañaISGlobal, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-1489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exposome concept aims to consider all environmental stressors simultaneously. The dimension of the data and the correlation that may exist between exposures lead to various statistical challenges. Some methodological studies have provided insight regarding the efficiency of specific modeling approaches in the context of exposome data assessed once for each subject. However, few studies have considered the situation in which environmental exposures are assessed repeatedly. Here, we conduct a simulation study to compare the performance of statistical approaches to assess exposome-health associations in the context of multiple exposure variables. Different scenarios were tested, assuming different types and numbers of exposure-outcome causal relationships. An application study using real data collected within the INMA mother-child cohort (Spain) is also presented. In the simulation experiment, assessed methods showed varying performance across scenarios, making it challenging to recommend a one-size-fits-all strategy. Generally, methods such as sparse partial least-squares and the deletion-substitution-addition algorithm tended to outperform the other tested methods (ExWAS, Elastic-Net, DLNM, or sNPLS). Notably, as the number of true predictors increased, the performance of all methods declined. The absence of a clearly superior approach underscores the additional challenges posed by repeated exposome data, such as the presence of more complex correlation structures and interdependencies between variables, and highlights that careful consideration is essential when selecting the appropriate statistical method. In this regard, we provide recommendations based on the expected scenario. Given the heightened risk of reporting false positive or negative associations when applying these techniques to repeated exposome data, we advise interpreting the results with caution, particularly in compromised contexts such as those with a limited sample size.

Indexed as

ExposomeAlgorithmsEnvironmental ExposureHumansSpainepidemiologyexposomerepeated measuressimulationstatistics

Identifiers

PMID37844068
PMCPMC10621661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.