Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843975›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Single-shot quantitative x-ray imaging using a primary modulator and dual-layer detector.

Linxi Shi, Nathaniel Robert Bennett, Alexander Vezeridis, Nishita Kothary, Adam S Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linxi ShiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Nathaniel Robert BennettDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Alexander VezeridisDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Nishita KotharyDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Adam S WangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Single-Shot Quantitative X-ray Imaging for Interventional ProceduresR21EB030080 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, ADAM S · 2020 to 2022
$603k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030080NIH HHS R21EB030080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional x-ray imaging and fluoroscopy have limitations in quantitation due to several challenges, including scatter, beam hardening, and overlapping tissues. Dual-energy (DE) imaging, with its capability to quantify area density of specific materials, is well-suited to address such limitations, but only if the dual-energy projections are acquired with perfect spatial and temporal alignment and corrected for scatter. PURPOSE: In this work, we propose single-shot quantitative imaging (SSQI) by combining the use of a primary modulator (PM) and dual-layer (DL) detector, which enables motion-free DE imaging with scatter correction in a single exposure.

methodsThe key components of our SSQI setup include a PM and DL detector, where the former enables scatter correction for the latter while the latter enables beam hardening correction for the former. The SSQI algorithm allows simultaneous recovery of two material-specific images and two scatter images using four sub-measurements from the PM encoding. The concept was first demonstrated using simulation of chest x-ray imaging for a COVID patient. For validation, we set up SSQI geometry on our tabletop system and imaged acrylic and copper slabs with known thicknesses (acrylic: 0-22.5 cm; copper: 0-0.9 mm), estimated scatter with our SSQI algorithm, and compared the material decomposition (MD) for different combinations of the two materials with ground truth. Second, we imaged an anthropomorphic chest phantom containing contrast in the coronary arteries and compared the MD with and without SSQI. Lastly, to evaluate SSQI in dynamic applications, we constructed a flow phantom that enabled dynamic imaging of iodine contrast.

resultsOur simulation study demonstrated that SSQI led to accurate scatter correction and MD, particularly for smaller focal blur and finer PM pitch. In the validation study, we found that the root mean squared error (RMSE) of SSQI estimation was 0.13 cm for acrylic and 0.04 mm for copper. For the anthropomorphic phantom, direct MD resulted in incorrect interpretation of contrast and soft tissue, while SSQI successfully distinguished them quantitatively, reducing RMSE in material-specific images by 38%-92%. For the flow phantom, SSQI was able to perform accurate dynamic quantitative imaging, separating contrast from the background.

conclusionsWe demonstrated the potential of SSQI for robust quantitative x-ray imaging. The integration of SSQI is straightforward with the addition of a PM and upgrade to a DL detector, which may enable its widespread adoption, including in techniques such as radiography and dynamic imaging (i.e., real-time image guidance and cone-beam CT).

Indexed as

CopperTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansPhantoms, ImagingScattering, RadiationX-RaysCopperdual energy imagingdual layerflat panel detectormaterial decompositionscatter correction

Identifiers

PMID37843975
PMCPMC11005317
OpenAlexW4387667021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.