Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843903›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2025

Fish processing side streams are promising ingredients in diets for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) -Effects on growth physiology, appetite, and intestinal health.

Niklas Warwas, Markus Langeland, Jonathan A C Roques, Marie Montjouridès, Jolie Smeets, Henrik Sundh, Elisabeth Jönsson, Kristina Sundell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Niklas WarwasDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5217-4294
Markus LangelandBlue Food, Center for Future Seafood, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jonathan A C RoquesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marie MontjouridèsDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jolie SmeetsDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Henrik SundhDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elisabeth JönssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kristina SundellDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Göteborgs UniversitetKungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien GFS2021-0040Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2020-02834Swedish board of Agriculture 3.3.17-17137/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the growth of aquaculture and the finite supply of fishmeal and oil, alternative marine protein and lipid sources are highly sought after. Particularly promising is the use of side streams from the fish processing industry, allowing for the recovery and retention of otherwise lost nutrients in the food production chain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential of three fish processing side streams as fish feed ingredients. The side streams originated from different stages of the production chain, were used without further processing, and included sprat trimmings (heads, frames, viscera), marinated herring (fillets), and mackerel in tomato sauce (fillets and sauce). The three side streams contained moderate levels of protein (28-32% dry matter) and high levels of lipid (34-43%). The sprat trimmings included ca. 29% ash and 1.5% phosphorous, which may add value due to the high level of essential minerals but needs to be considered in feed formulations. Three diets were formulated to include 50% of each side stream replacing all fishmeal and ca. 80% of the fish oil of the control diet, which contained 35% fishmeal and 10% fish oil. The diets were evaluated in a 12-week feeding trial using rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish fed the sprat diet displayed the highest feed intake and growth and showed no negative effects on the intestinal health. The mackerel side stream displayed a good digestibility but resulted in lower growth rates compared to the sprat trimmings. Fish fed the herring diet displayed the lowest performance regarding growth, feed intake, and digestibility. They further exhibited a reduction in nutrient uptake in both proximal and distal intestines, likely contributing to the observed lower digestibility and growth, and a reduction in plasma ghrelin levels. As part of a circular approach to increase marine lipid and protein production for fish feed, the tested sprat and mackerel side streams are promising raw materials; however, additional studies using more commercial-like feed formulations are encouraged.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAppetiteDietIntestinesOncorhynchus mykissAnimalsAquaculturealternative feedappetiteaquacultureintestinal healthnutritionside stream

Identifiers

PMID37843903
PMCPMC11758193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.