Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843855›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Landscape of Clinical Resistance Mechanisms to FGFR Inhibitors in FGFR2-Altered Cholangiocarcinoma.

Qibiao Wu, Haley Ellis, Giulia Siravegna, Alexa G Michel, Bryanna L Norden, Ferran Fece de la Cruz, Eranga Roshan Balasooriya, Yuanli Zhen, Vanessa S Silveira, Jianwe Che and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Recurrent Resistance Mutations to Lirafugratinib Inform Treatment Sequencing in FGFR2-Driven Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Co-repression ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qibiao WuMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0000-5445-5201
Haley EllisMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-9640
Giulia SiravegnaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7132-6484
Alexa G MichelMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-9612
Bryanna L NordenMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2084-473X
Ferran Fece de la CruzMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2694-4838
Eranga Roshan BalasooriyaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-5491-3089
Yuanli ZhenMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9383-9117
Vanessa S SilveiraMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-5633-9490
Jianwe CheDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4956-4811
Ryan B CorcoranMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-8173-5778
Nabeel BardeesyMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-3867-0416
Broad Institute · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Tissue and Pathology ResourcesP50CA127003 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BASS, ADAM JOEL · 2007 to 2023
$33.2M
Project 2U54CA224068 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CORCORAN, RYAN BRUCE, FLAHERTY, KEITH T · 2017 to 2021
$6.3M
Understanding Mechanisms of Resistance to Anti-angiogenic TreatmentsR01CA160216 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ARBAB, ALI SYED · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127003NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160216NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFGFR inhibitors are effective in FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma, leading to approval of reversible FGFR inhibitors, pemigatinib and infigratinib, and an irreversible inhibitor, futibatinib. However, acquired resistance develops, limiting clinical benefit. Some mechanisms of resistance have been reported, including secondary FGFR2 kinase domain mutations. Here, we sought to establish the landscape of acquired resistance to FGFR inhibition and to validate findings in model systems. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe examined the spectrum of acquired resistance mechanisms detected in circulating tumor DNA or tumor tissue upon disease progression following FGFR inhibitor therapy in 82 FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma patients from 12 published reports. Functional studies of candidate resistance alterations were performed.

resultsOverall, 49 of 82 patients (60%) had one or more detectable secondary FGFR2 kinase domain mutations upon acquired resistance. N550 molecular brake and V565 gatekeeper mutations were most common, representing 63% and 47% of all FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, respectively. Functional studies showed different inhibitors displayed unique activity profiles against FGFR2 mutations. Interestingly, disruption of the cysteine residue covalently bound by futibatinib (FGFR2 C492) was rare, observed in 1 of 42 patients treated with this drug. FGFR2 C492 mutations were insensitive to inhibition by futibatinib but showed reduced signaling activity, potentially explaining their low frequency.

conclusionsThese data support secondary FGFR2 kinase domain mutations as the primary mode of acquired resistance to FGFR inhibitors, most commonly N550 and V565 mutations. Thus, development of combination strategies and next-generation FGFR inhibitors targeting the full spectrum of FGFR2 resistance mutations will be critical.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2Signal TransductionFGFR2 protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2

Identifiers

PMID37843855
PMCPMC10767308
OpenAlexW4387661783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.