Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843799›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2024

Human Cerebrospinal Fluid Sample Preparation and Annotation for Integrated Lipidomics and Metabolomics Profiling Studies.

Kourosh Hooshmand, Jin Xu, Anja Hviid Simonsen, Asger Wretlind, Andressa de Zawadzki, Karolina Sulek, Steen Gregers Hasselbalch, Cristina Legido-Quigley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Separative Techniques Coupled to Mass Spectrometry for Metabolomic Analysis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent Advances in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Metabolite Analysis from Protein Deposits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kourosh HooshmandSystem Medicine, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Jin XuInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Anja Hviid SimonsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Asger WretlindSystem Medicine, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Andressa de ZawadzkiSystem Medicine, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Karolina SulekSystem Medicine, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Steen Gregers HasselbalchDanish Dementia Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cristina Legido-QuigleySystem Medicine, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark. cristina.legido.quigley@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4018-214X
Steno Diabetes Centers · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a metabolically diverse biofluid and a key specimen for exploring biochemical changes in neurodegenerative diseases. Detecting lipid species in CSF using mass spectrometry (MS)-based techniques remains challenging because lipids are highly complex in structure, and their concentrations span over a broad dynamic range. This work aimed to develop a robust lipidomics and metabolomics method based on commonly used two-phase extraction systems from human CSF samples. Prioritizing lipid detection, biphasic extraction methods, Folch, Bligh and Dyer (B&D), Matyash, and acidified Folch and B&D (aFolch and aB&D) were compared using 150 μL of human CSF samples for the simultaneous extraction of lipids and metabolites with a wide range of polarity. Multiple chromatographical separation approaches, including reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), and gas chromatography (GC), were utilized to characterize human CSF metabolome. The aB&D method was found as the most reproducible technique (RSD < 15%) for lipid extraction. The aB&D and B&D yielded the highest peak intensities for targeted lipid internal standards and displayed superior extracting power for major endogenous lipid classes. A total of 674 unique metabolites with a wide polarity range were annotated in CSF using, combining RPLC-MS/MS lipidomics (n = 219), HILIC-MS/MS (n = 304), and GC-quadrupole time of flight (QTOF) MS (n = 151). Overall, our findings show that the aB&D extraction method provided suitable lipid coverage, reproducibility, and extraction efficiency for global lipidomics profiling of human CSF samples. In combination with RPLC-MS/MS lipidomics, complementary screening approaches enabled a comprehensive metabolite signature that can be employed in an array of clinical studies.

Indexed as

LipidomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryHumansLipidsMetabolomicsReproducibility of ResultsLipidsCerebrospinal fluidLipidomicsLipidsMass spectrometryMetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID37843799
PMCPMC10973045
OpenAlexW4387661066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.