Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843788›Full record

SynthesisHepatology international2024

TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Jiaxi Liu, Peng Wang, Liqi Shang, Zhoubo Zhang, Yulong Tian, Xiaowei Chen, Yanan Ma, Haibo Shao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hepatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaxi Liu *Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 Nanjing Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Peng Wang *Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 Nanjing Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Liqi ShangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 Nanjing Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Zhoubo ZhangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 Nanjing Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Yulong TianDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 Nanjing Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Xiaowei ChenDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 Nanjing Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Yanan MaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. ynma@cmu.edu.cn.
Haibo ShaoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 Nanjing Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China. hbshao@cmu.edu.cn.
China Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

Liaoning Medical-Engineering Cross Fund 2022-YGJC-53National Hi-Technology Research and Development Program No.2012AA022701National Natural Science Foundation of China 82111530100National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82072037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to compare the therapeutic efficacy and adverse events (AEs) between the following treatment strategies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (TACE + T + I) versus TACE plus TKIs (TACE + T).

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies comparing TACE + T + I and TACE + T for the treatment of BCLC intermediate- or advanced-stage HCC. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs were included as outcomes. We used a fixed- or random-effects model based on the results of a heterogeneity evaluation and performed a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 16.0. We then carried out the TSA.

resultsFive studies examining a total of 425 patients were included in this study. Our meta-analysis revealed that, compared to TACE + T, TACE + T + I significantly improved the ORR (risk ratio [RR] = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-1.85, p < 0.01) and extended both the median PFS (mean difference [MD] = 4.51 months, 95% CI = 2.16-6.87, p < 0.01) and median OS (MD = 5.75 months, 95% CI = 4.03-7.48, p < 0.01). These results were tested to be true by the TSA without requiring a larger information size. Among AEs, hypertension tended to occur more often in patients treated with TACE + T + I than in those treated with TACE + T (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.05-2.40, p < 0.05). However, the TSA suggested that additional cases are necessary to confirm this difference. Regarding the other AEs, no significant differences were detected between the two groups.

conclusionTACE + T + I showed better effects on the ORR, PFS, and OS than TACE + T as a treatment for BCLC stages B and C HCC, without an obvious increase in the AEs. Based on these findings, well-designed, large RCTs are suggested.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLiver NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsCombined Modality TherapyHumansTreatment OutcomeTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsHepatocellular carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMeta-analysisTACETrial sequential analysisTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37843788
OpenAlexW4387661250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.