SynthesisHepatology international2024
TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in Hepatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE and lenvatinib: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Immune-targeted therapy with transarterial chemo(embolization) for unresectable HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of neutrophil extracellular traps in hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment and targeted therapy progress.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of systemic therapy combined with interventional treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective case series.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Monitoring of GRIm and HCC-GRIm Scores Reveals Immunologically Relevant Prognostic Indicators in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing TACE Plus ICIs and Anti-VEGF Antibodies/TKIs.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Stage-Dependent Efficacy of TACE Combined with Tyrosine Kinase and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Conversion Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Gustave Roussy Immune Score Predicts Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with TACE and Immunotherapy.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Article
- Breaking bottlenecks: the future of hepatocellular carcinoma clinical trials and therapeutic targets.Hepatology international · 2025Review
- Donafenib and sintilimab combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective, single-arm phase II trial (DoHAICs study).EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of survival benefit and safety profile between lenvatinib and donafenib as conversion therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- The Prognostic Value of CRP/Alb Ratio in Predicting Overall Survival for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transcatheter Intra-Arterial Therapy Combined with Molecular-Targeted Agents and PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Combined TACE with Targeted and Immunotherapy versus TACE Alone Improves DFS in HCC with MVI: A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable and unresectable, embolization-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Machine learning for prognostic impact in elderly unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of TACE combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and camrelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.Oncology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe conducted a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to compare the therapeutic efficacy and adverse events (AEs) between the following treatment strategies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (TACE + T + I) versus TACE plus TKIs (TACE + T).
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies comparing TACE + T + I and TACE + T for the treatment of BCLC intermediate- or advanced-stage HCC. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs were included as outcomes. We used a fixed- or random-effects model based on the results of a heterogeneity evaluation and performed a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 16.0. We then carried out the TSA.
resultsFive studies examining a total of 425 patients were included in this study. Our meta-analysis revealed that, compared to TACE + T, TACE + T + I significantly improved the ORR (risk ratio [RR] = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-1.85, p < 0.01) and extended both the median PFS (mean difference [MD] = 4.51 months, 95% CI = 2.16-6.87, p < 0.01) and median OS (MD = 5.75 months, 95% CI = 4.03-7.48, p < 0.01). These results were tested to be true by the TSA without requiring a larger information size. Among AEs, hypertension tended to occur more often in patients treated with TACE + T + I than in those treated with TACE + T (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.05-2.40, p < 0.05). However, the TSA suggested that additional cases are necessary to confirm this difference. Regarding the other AEs, no significant differences were detected between the two groups.
conclusionTACE + T + I showed better effects on the ORR, PFS, and OS than TACE + T as a treatment for BCLC stages B and C HCC, without an obvious increase in the AEs. Based on these findings, well-designed, large RCTs are suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.