Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843659›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

The sharks are circling: a qualitative study of living with metastatic breast cancer.

Constance Visovsky, Victoria K Marshall, Maria Moreno, Pooja Advani, Dawn Mussallem, Cindy Tofthagen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a self-directed online psychosocial intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer: Finding My Way-Advanced.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 - metastatic breast cancer-a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Constance VisovskyCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. cvisovsk@usf.edu.
Victoria K MarshallCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Maria MorenoCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Pooja AdvaniMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Dawn MussallemMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Cindy TofthagenMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this phenomenological study was to gain an understanding of the intersection of continued treatment and quality of life in women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

methodsThis was a qualitative study in which women with MBC were interviewed about their perceptions how MBC affected their physical, emotional, and role functioning.

resultsParticipants (n = 16) were mostly Caucasian (86.7%) and non-Hispanic (93.3%). The mean age was 55.62 years. Most women were on their third or greater line of treatment (68.5%). Themes identified from analysis of the transcripts revealed the following: (1) shock and devastation of the initial diagnosis; (2) feeling as if the sharks are circling; (3) cancer is a rollercoaster with never-ending treatments; (4) individual definitions of quality of life; and (5) you are not the person you once were.

conclusionsSymptoms, ongoing treatments, treatment changes, and disease progression negatively influence physical, emotional, and role function. Women with MBC define quality of life in different ways, and while symptoms and functional limitations are present, the cancer experience causes some to reevaluate their lives and focus on their individual priorities and values. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Although newly developed treatments increase survival among women with MBC, the symptoms, concerns, and issues surrounding QOL remain unresolved. The relatively high price of continuous treatment and disease exacerbation is indicative of the need for multi-pronged intervention strategies that address physical, mental, and emotional aspects of living with MBC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisQualitative ResearchMetastatic breast cancerQualitative researchQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.