Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843612›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Parental measurement of height in growth hormone-treated children in the hospital setting proves valid: an observational study - potential for replacement of outpatient clinic visits to the home setting.

Anouk J W Remmits, Ghislaine A P G van Mastrigt, Silvia M A A Evers, Hedi L Claahsen-van der Grinten, Petra A van Setten

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anouk J W RemmitsDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ghislaine A P G van MastrigtSchool for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Silvia M A A EversSchool for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hedi L Claahsen-van der GrintenDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Petra A van SettenDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Petra.vanSetten@radboudumc.nl.
Maastricht University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLAmalia Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable height measurement plays a pivotal role in evaluating the efficacy of costly growth hormone (GH) therapy in children. Currently, regularly outpatient clinic visits are needed to accurately measure height. The outpatient clinic visits are time-consuming for parents as well for health care professionals. This observational study aimed to investigate the validity of parentally performed height measurements compared to height measurements in the outpatient setting. An observational study was performed at the outpatient clinic of Amalia's Children's Hospital Nijmegen. A portable stadiometer (PS) was developed for height measurements at home. Measurements with the PS were performed by the researcher (PSR) and parents/caregivers (PSP). Measurements performed with the electronic digital ruler (EDS) were considered as the gold standard. The parents were potentially unblinded for the gold standard measurement (EDS). Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Pearson's correlation tests were performed. The Bland-Altman plots were made to illustrate the correlation of the PSR or PSP with the gold standard. The correlation between the height measurements with PSR or PSP compared to the EDS was substantial (PSR: r = 0.9998, R

conclusionWe found a strong correlation between the PSR or PSP and the EDS, with only a minor underestimation of approximately 0.2-0.3 cm. In our opinion, this underestimation is clinically irrelevant as it does not result in an adjustment in GH dose. To conclude, parental height measurements could be a promising tool as it partially replaces outpatient clinic visits needed for measurements of height. Further studies are required to confirm this statement. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The immense impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on health care has increased telemedicine worldwide. For adequate integration of telemedicine in paediatric growth hormone treatment, reliable height and weight measurements in the home setting are required. • Earlier studies have shown that parents are capable to reliable perform height measurements in healthy children. WHAT IS NEW: • To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a strong correlation between the height measurements with a portable stadiometer by parents and those made with the electronic digital ruler (gold standard) in children treated with growth hormone. There was only a minor underestimation of approximately 0.2-0.3 cm, which we anticipated to be clinically irrelevant. • Therefore, home height measurements can at least partly replace costly outpatient visits for children being treated with growth hormone as part of an uncomplicated course. Moreover, these results may also be promising for implementation in other paediatric populations besides children treated with growth hormone.

Indexed as

Body HeightGrowth HormoneAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildHospitalsHumansParentsGrowth HormoneHeightParentally reportedPortable stadiometerTransitioning outpatient visits to home careValidity

Identifiers

PMID37843612
PMCPMC10951002
OpenAlexW4387661801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.