Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843588›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Arthroscopic all-inside ligament repair has similar or superior clinical outcomes compared to open repair for chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra-articular pathology at 5 years follow-up.

Matteo Guelfi, Rayan Baalbaki, Francesc Malagelada, Miki Dalmau-Pastor, Jordi Vega

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Arthroscopic techniques in ankle surgery.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo GuelfiFoot and Ankle Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, Genoa, Italy. matteogue@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-4648
Rayan BaalbakiFoot and Ankle Department, Clinique Montchoisi, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francesc MalageladaFoot and Ankle Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Miki Dalmau-PastorMIFAS By GRECMIP (Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Society), Merignac, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-698X
Jordi VegaMIFAS By GRECMIP (Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Society), Merignac, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOpen ligament repair is widely considered the gold standard treatment for chronic ankle instability. Nevertheless, arthroscopic treatment of ankle instability has gained popularity becoming the preferred technique for many surgeons. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic versus open lateral ligament repair for chronic ankle instability at 5 years follow-up.

methodsNinety consecutive patients were surgically treated for chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra-articular pathology observed on MRI: 41 patients [median age 28 (range 15-54) years] underwent an open lateral ligament repair (OLR); 49 patients [median age 30 (range 19-47) years] underwent an all-inside arthroscopic ligament repair (ALR). Functional outcomes using the Foot Functional Index (FFI), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot Score, and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sports Subscale (FAAM-SS) were assessed preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. At the latest follow-up, the satisfaction rate and complications were also recorded.

resultsThe mean follow-up was 58 ± 17.6 (range 47-81) months. In both groups FFI, AOFAS and FAAM-SS score significantly improved compared to preoperative values (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups in the AOFAS (n.s) and FAAM-SS (n.s), but the FFI results were significantly better in the ALR group (p < 0.05). No major complications were reported in either group.

conclusionOpen and arthroscopic ligament repair to treat chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra-articular pathology produced excellent comparable clinical outcomes at 5 years follow-up. The complications were minimal in both study groups with no significant differences in AOFAS and FAAM-SS scores. However, arthroscopic repair showed significantly better results on the FFI. Therefore, when treating chronic lateral ankle instability, surgeons should consider arthroscopic ligament repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityLateral Ligament, AnkleAdolescentAdultAnkleAnkle JointArthroscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansLigamentsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAll-inside repairAnkle arthroscopyChronic ankle instabilityComparative studyLigament repairOpen Broström

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.