ArticleEuropean radiology2024
A deep learning framework for intracranial aneurysms automatic segmentation and detection on magnetic resonance T1 images.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Methodological review of the level of statistical support declared in radiological research articles.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- A Machine learning pipeline to investigate tissue ingrowth in cerebral aneurysms using preclinical animal models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transformer-based fusion of radiomics-habitat and deep learning for assessing unruptured intracranial aneurysm instability.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Evaluation of AI-Powered Routine Screening of Clinically Acquired cMRIs for Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intracranial aneurysm segmentation on digital subtraction angiography: a retrospective and multi-center study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Intracranial aneurysm segmentation with nnU-net: utilizing loss functions and automated vessel extraction.Vessel plus · 2025Article
- Morphology and Texture-Guided Deep Neural Network for Intracranial Aneurysm Segmentation in 3D TOF-MRA.Neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Automated Method for Intracranial Aneurysm Classification Using Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Integrating PointNet-Based Model and Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Rupture Status of IAs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo design a deep learning-based framework for automatic segmentation and detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) on magnetic resonance T1 images and test the robustness and performance of framework.
methodsA retrospective diagnostic study was conducted based on 159 IAs from 136 patients who underwent the T1 images. Among them, 127 cases were randomly selected for training and validation, and 32 cases were used to assess the accuracy and consistency of our algorithm. We developed and assembled three convolutional neural networks for the segmentation and detection of IAs. The segmentation and detection performance of the model were compared with the ground truth, and various metrics were calculated at the voxel level, IAs level, and patient level to show the performance of our framework.
resultsOur assembled model achieved overall Dice, voxel-level sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and F1 score of 0.802, 0.874, 0.9998, 0.937, and 0.802, respectively. A coincidence greater than 0.7 between the aneurysms predicted by the model and the ground truth was considered as a true positive. For IAs detection, the sensitivity reached 90.63% with 0.58 false positives per case. The volume of IAs segmented by our model showed a high agreement and consistency with the volume of IAs labeled by experts.
conclusionThe deep learning framework is achievable and robust for IAs segmentation and detection. Our model offers more clinical application opportunities compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-based, CTA-based, and MRA-based methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our deep learning framework effectively detects and segments intracranial aneurysms using clinical routine T1 sequences, showing remarkable effectiveness and offering great potential for improving the detection of latent intracranial aneurysms and enabling early identification. KEY POINTS: •There is no segmentation method based on clinical routine T1 images. Our study shows that the proper deep learning framework can effectively localize the intracranial aneurysms. •The T1-based segmentation and detection method is more universal than other angiography-based detection methods, which can potentially reduce missed diagnoses caused by the absence of angiography images. •The deep learning framework is robust and has the potential to be applied in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37843574What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.