Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843574›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

A deep learning framework for intracranial aneurysms automatic segmentation and detection on magnetic resonance T1 images.

Junda Qu, Hao Niu, Yutang Li, Ting Chen, Fei Peng, Jiaxiang Xia, Xiaoxin He, Boya Xu, Xuge Chen, Rui Li and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Junda QuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hao NiuBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yutang LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ting ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fei PengBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiaxiang XiaBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxin HeBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Boya XuBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xuge ChenBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Rui LiCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Aihua LiuBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. liuaihuadoctor@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4437-558X
Xu ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. zhangxu@ccmu.edu.cn.
Chunlin LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. lichunlin1981@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo design a deep learning-based framework for automatic segmentation and detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) on magnetic resonance T1 images and test the robustness and performance of framework.

methodsA retrospective diagnostic study was conducted based on 159 IAs from 136 patients who underwent the T1 images. Among them, 127 cases were randomly selected for training and validation, and 32 cases were used to assess the accuracy and consistency of our algorithm. We developed and assembled three convolutional neural networks for the segmentation and detection of IAs. The segmentation and detection performance of the model were compared with the ground truth, and various metrics were calculated at the voxel level, IAs level, and patient level to show the performance of our framework.

resultsOur assembled model achieved overall Dice, voxel-level sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and F1 score of 0.802, 0.874, 0.9998, 0.937, and 0.802, respectively. A coincidence greater than 0.7 between the aneurysms predicted by the model and the ground truth was considered as a true positive. For IAs detection, the sensitivity reached 90.63% with 0.58 false positives per case. The volume of IAs segmented by our model showed a high agreement and consistency with the volume of IAs labeled by experts.

conclusionThe deep learning framework is achievable and robust for IAs segmentation and detection. Our model offers more clinical application opportunities compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-based, CTA-based, and MRA-based methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our deep learning framework effectively detects and segments intracranial aneurysms using clinical routine T1 sequences, showing remarkable effectiveness and offering great potential for improving the detection of latent intracranial aneurysms and enabling early identification. KEY POINTS: •There is no segmentation method based on clinical routine T1 images. Our study shows that the proper deep learning framework can effectively localize the intracranial aneurysms. •The T1-based segmentation and detection method is more universal than other angiography-based detection methods, which can potentially reduce missed diagnoses caused by the absence of angiography images. •The deep learning framework is robust and has the potential to be applied in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceDeep learningIntracranial aneurysmsMagnetic resonance imagingT1

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.