Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843567›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

The effect of optical degradation from cataract using a new Deep Learning optical coherence tomography segmentation algorithm.

Davide Allegrini, Raffaele Raimondi, Tania Sorrentino, Domenico Tripepi, Elisa Stradiotto, Marco Caruso, Francesco Paolo De Rosa, Mario R Romano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Davide AllegriniEye Center, Humanitas Gavazzeni-Castelli, Bergamo, Italy.
Raffaele RaimondiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy. raffor9@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8472-7984
Tania SorrentinoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy.
Domenico TripepiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy.
Elisa StradiottoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy.
Marco CarusoPolitoBIOMed Lab-Biomedical Engineering Lab and Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico Di Torino, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Francesco Paolo De RosaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy.
Mario R RomanoEye Center, Humanitas Gavazzeni-Castelli, Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the validity of the results of a freely available online Deep Learning segmentation tool and its sensitivity to noise introduced by cataract.

methodsThe OCT images were collected with a Spectralis SD-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) as part of normal clinical practice. Data were segmented using a freely available online tool called Relayer ( https://www.relayer.online/ ), based on a cross-platform Deep Learning segmentation architecture specifically adapted for retinal OCT images. The segmentations were read into MATLAB (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) and analyzed.

resultsThere was an excellent agreement between the ETDRS measurements obtained from the two algorithms. Upon visual inspection, the segmentation based on Deep Learning obtained with Relayer appeared more accurate except in one case of apparent good quality image showing interrupted segmentations in some of the B-scans.

conclusionA freely available online Deep Learning segmentation tool showed good and promising performance in healthy retinas before and after cataract surgery, proving robust to optical degradation of the image from media opacities.

Indexed as

CataractDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceCataract optical degradationDeep LearningOCTOptical coherence tomographySegmentation algorithm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.