ArticleThe journal of adhesive dentistry2023
New Methods for Replacing Single Missing Teeth with Non-prep Bridges (NPBs) - A Case Series.
Article in The journal of adhesive dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNewly developed non-invasive methods for replace a missing tooth and closing single-tooth gaps in the poster- ior region using resin composite are presented. MATERIALS AND
methodsFour different non-invasive methods and the technical procedures, materials and instruments used are presented in a case series. These include the direct intraoral insertion of composite (with and without individual shaping aids) and indirect restorations, which are fabricated conventionally or digitally and bonded.
resultsThe case series showed that all four methods can be used to replace single missing teeth in the posterior region, meeting current clinical requirements. Particular attention was paid to the design of the pontics, the dimension of the connector area, firm proximal contacts to the adjacent teeth, hygiene, and appearance of the non-prep bridges (NPBs). The advantages and disadvantages for both the direct and indirect techniques illustrated in this case series were com- pared in detail.
conclusionsSeveral direct and indirect non-invasive methods for single-tooth replacement are available today. Although the evidence is still limited, there is a potential for frugal dental interventions with NPBs. Further experimental and clinical studies are necessary to demonstrate that they reliably meet quality requirements (including sufficient survival rates), satisfy the criteria of cost-effectiveness (compared to treatment alternatives) and that there is a demand from the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.