ArticleNeural regeneration research2024
Artificial intelligence analysis of videos to augment clinical assessment: an overview.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic and explainable assessment for Parkinson's disease by video-based human motion understanding.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A research roadmap for AI opportunities in student assessment for medical education.BMC medical education · 2025Review
- Video-Based Data-Driven Models for Diagnosing Movement Disorders: Review and Future Directions.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Review
- Towards Sensor-Based Mobility Assessment for Older Adults: A Multimodal Framework Integrating PoseNet Gait Dynamics and InBody Composition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nonlinear Dynamics Analysis of Handgrip Strength Using the Poincaré Plot Method Through Video Processing Techniques.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.