Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37843174›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

Effect of efgartigimod on muscle group subdomains in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis: post hoc analyses of the phase 3 pivotal ADAPT study.

Vera Bril, James F Howard, Chafic Karam, Jan L De Bleecker, Hiroyuki Murai, Kimiaki Utsugisawa, Peter Ulrichts, Edward Brauer, Sihui Zhao, Renato Mantegazza and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Vera BrilEllen and Martin Prosserman Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-4883
James F HowardDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-8617
Chafic KaramPenn Neuroscience Center-Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Jan L De BleeckerDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hiroyuki MuraiDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan.
Kimiaki UtsugisawaDepartment of Neurology, Hanamaki General Hospital, Hanamaki, Japan.
Peter Ulrichtsargenx, Ghent, Belgium.
Edward Brauerargenx, Ghent, Belgium.
Sihui Zhaoargenx, Ghent, Belgium.
Renato MantegazzaDepartment of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9810-5737
Tuan VuDepartment of Neurology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
ADAPT Study Group
Argenx (Belgium) · BEFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITGhent University Hospital · BEHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPNational Hospital Organization Hanamaki Hospital · JPUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Argenx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeGeneralized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare, chronic, neuromuscular autoimmune disease mediated by pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies. Patients with gMG experience debilitating muscle weakness, resulting in impaired mobility, speech, swallowing, vision and respiratory function. Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment engineered for increased binding affinity to neonatal Fc receptor. The neonatal Fc receptor blockade by efgartigimod competitively inhibits endogenous IgG binding, leading to decreased IgG recycling and increased degradation resulting in lower IgG concentration.

methodsThe safety and efficacy of efgartigimod were evaluated in the ADAPT study. Key efficacy outcome measures included Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. Efgartigimod demonstrated significant improvement in both the MG-ADL and QMG scores. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine whether all subdomains of MG-ADL and QMG improved with efgartigimod treatment. Individual items of MG-ADL and QMG were grouped into four subdomains: bulbar, ocular, limb/gross motor and respiratory. Change from baseline over 10 weeks in each subdomain was calculated for each group.

resultsGreater improvements from baseline were seen across MG-ADL subdomains in participants treated with efgartigimod compared with placebo. These improvements were typically observed 1 to 2 weeks after the first infusion and correlated with reductions in IgG. Similar results were observed across most QMG subdomains.

conclusionsThese post hoc analyses of MG-ADL and QMG subdomain data from ADAPT suggest that efgartigimod is beneficial in improving muscle function and strength across all muscle groups, leading to the observed efficacy in participants with gMG.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingMyasthenia GravisHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin GInfant, NewbornMusclesImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin GADAPTefgartigimodgeneralized myasthenia gravisimmunoglobulin Gneonatal Fc receptor

Identifiers

PMID37843174
PMCPMC11235734
OpenAlexW4387661130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.