Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37842623›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Rectal malakoplakia mimicking advanced rectal cancer: A case report.

Xiangyu Liu, Chenming Yu, Zhuo Zhao, Yiping Zheng, Xin Chen, Dandan Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiangyu LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Chenming YuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Lishui District People's Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Zhuo ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yiping ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Dandan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
First Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CNLishui City People's Hospital · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malakoplakia is a rare acquired chronic infectious granulomatous condition, that is characterized by the accumulation of large granular macrophages containing basophilic inclusion bodies in the cytoplasm termed Michaelis-Gutmann (MG) bodies. Malakoplakia most commonly involves the genitourinary system, and the second most commonly affected site is the gastrointestinal tract. Rectal malakoplakia is an unusual entity that is difficult to diagnose due to its diverse clinical manifestations and radiological findings that are similar to different diseases and advanced cancers. Case description: A 61-year-old male patient presented with difficulty in urination and defecation that started 4 months prior, along with a weight loss of 10 kg. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scanning revealed diffuse lesions of the perirectal region with multiple lymphadenopathies and involvement of the bladder, prostate, bilateral seminal vesicles, and left ureter. 18F-FDG PET/CT MIP showed intense FDG uptake in the rectal region, and a diagnosis of an occupying lesion was proposed. Colonoscopy and histological examination of rectal lesion biopsies showed the characteristic features of malakoplakia. Conclusion: Malakoplakia of the rectum with lymph node involvement and adjacent organ extension has been extensively misdiagnosed in clinical practice, and mimics malignancy radiologically. It is of great importance for radiologists to be aware of malakoplakia when making the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mass lesions of the rectum, although the radiologic findings are nonspecific. Endoscopic evaluation and pathologic examination of a biopsy should be recommended to make the correct diagnosis, which may prevent unnecessary surgical resection.

Indexed as

Case reportFDG PET/CTMalakoplakiaMichaelis-gutmann bodiesRectum

Identifiers

PMID37842623
PMCPMC10568101
OpenAlexW4387394247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.