ArticleHeliyon2023
Characterizing infection risk in a restaurant environment due to airborne diseases using discrete droplet dispersion simulations.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of masks as a measure to control the spread of respiratory viruses has been widely acknowledged. However, there are instances where wearing a mask is not possible, making these environments potential vectors for virus transmission. Such environments can contain multiple sources of infection and are challenging to characterize in terms of infection risk. To address this issue, we have developed a methodology to investigate the role of ventilation in reducing the infection risk in such environments. We use a restaurant setting as a representative scenario to demonstrate the methodology. Using implicit large eddy simulations along with discrete droplet dispersion modeling we investigate the impact of ventilation and physical distance on the spread of respiratory viruses and the risk of infection. Our findings show that operating ventilation systems, such as mechanical mixing and increasing physical distance between subjects, can significantly reduce the average room infection risk and number of newly infected subjects. However, this observation is subject to the transmissibility of the airborne viruses. In the case of a highly transmissible virus, the use of mechanical mixing may be inconsequential when compared to only fresh air ventilation. These findings provide valuable insights into the mitigation of infection risk in situations where the use of masks is not possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.