ArticleHeliyon2023
Feasibility and reliability of whintings scanwatch to record 4-lead Electrocardiogram: A comparative analysis with a standard ECG.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of wearable ECG and assessment of ventricular repolarization and its cardiovascular risks post cold stress.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Validation of smartwatch electrocardiogram intervals in children compared to standard 12 lead electrocardiograms.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent technological advances allowed us to produce some new wearable devices, such as smartphones and smartwatches (SW). These devices provide different services to their users through different software applications installed even in the SW or smartphones. Health monitoring functionalities, among these services, are nowadays the new technological fashion. In fact, the monitoring is ensured by the sensor incorporated in the SW. The SW allows the record of only one single lead Electrocardiogram (ECG), which is sufficient to screen or diagnosis of rhythm and conduction disorders, especially during the onset of cardiac symptoms, but insufficient for the detection of ischemic disease and cardiomyopathies. In this context, this paper aims to evaluate the feasibility, and reliability of a SW to obtain ECG recordings in comparison with a standard ECG. For that purpose, 140 patients were recruited for this analysis. At the first step, the 12 lead ECG followed with four lead SW-ECG; using the Withings Scanwatch device, were recorded in the same resting conditions. The four lead SW-ECG consists of Einthoven DI lead recorded with the SW, where the SW was on the left wrist and the right index finger on the crown, and three Wilson-type leads, in the which the V1 was recorded in the fourth right parasternal intercostal space, V3 was recorded in the fifth intercostal space on the midclavicular line, and V6 was recorded in the fifth intercostal space on the left midaxillary line with the right index finger placed on the crown and the left hand encompassing the right wrist. 700 ECGs recordings were collected and statistically analyzed in this study. In total, 97 % of the patients were able to obtain an ECG through the SW. A strong correlation was observed between the two recording methods concerning the duration of the studied parameters (r >90 %). The correlation coefficient showed that 33 out of 44 parameters have a strong correlation with the standard ECG. The similarity of the combined leads in the 4 established subgroups was significantly higher, meaning that increasing the number of leads would improve the detection of electrical anomalies. Our findings confirm the existing data on the high similarity between SW and standard 12-leads ECG. Despite SW not having the accuracy and utility of the standard ECG machine, they should be considered as an interesting screening tool for cardiac rhythm disorders, and a compelling solution to electrical documentation of general cardiac symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.