Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37842579›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Active methods in electricity and magnetism courses: Influence of degree, academic level and gender on student performance.

María-Antonia Serrano, Ana Vidaurre, José M Meseguer-Dueñas, Isabel Tort-Ausina, Susana Quiles, Roser Sabater I Serra, Tania García-Sanchez, Soledad Bernal-Pérez, M Amparo Gámiz-González, José Molina-Mateo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María-Antonia SerranoDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Ana VidaurreDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
José M Meseguer-DueñasDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Isabel Tort-AusinaDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Susana QuilesDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Roser Sabater I SerraElectrical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Tania García-SanchezElectrical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Soledad Bernal-PérezElectrical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
M Amparo Gámiz-GonzálezDepartamento de Educación, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, C/ Pintor Sorolla, 21, 46002, Valencia, Spain.
José Molina-MateoDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
José Antonio Gómez-TejedorDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Jaime RieraDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46021, Spain.
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESValencian International University · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of first-year students in electromagnetism (E&M) courses of different engineering degrees at a Spanish public university was measured using the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA), a standard research-based instrument to assess students' understanding after attending introductory courses in electricity and magnetism. In all cases, Flipped classroom (FC) built on information and communications technology was used. The objective of this paper is to analyse if the gain in the BEMA pre and post-test results is influenced by several factors such as the degree, the students' academic grade, and gender. Moreover, as some studies have shown that the students' retention of the concepts was significantly stronger in active learning than in traditional approaches, a third BEMA test was performed by the students to analyse the long-term retention gain dependence on the same factors. Students from different engineering degree programs were asked to complete two BEMA tests during the course and a third one after a few months. ANOVA tests were used to analyse the existence of significant differences in gain between student degree programs, student academic level and student gender. Results have shown no differences in the BEMA performance by degree program, but significant differences were found by academic level and gender. Retention did not depend on the degree course but on the academic level. Mean gain value by academic level, and gender was obtained and concluded that the best students presented the best gain results and that gain depends on the students' gender: males outperformed females in the BEMA tests, although there were no significant differences in the course grades. It is thus necessary to understand these differences and to implement measures in daily teaching work to improve women's performance.

Indexed as

And Mathematics (STEM) disciplinesBrief electricity and magnetism assessment (BEMA)Concept inventoryEngineeringFirst-year undergraduate studentsGender differencesPhysicsRetentionScienceStudent perceptionTechnology

Identifiers

PMID37842579
PMCPMC10568342
OpenAlexW4387082155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.