ArticleHeliyon2023
Molecular subtypes based on N6-methyladenosine RNA methylation demonstrate the heterogeneity of immune and biological functions in pediatric septic shock.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Septic shock in children is a highly heterogeneous syndrome involving different immune states and biological processes. We used a bioinformatics approach to explore the relationship between N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation and septic shock in children. Methods: A gene expression dataset including information on 98 children with septic shock was selected. To construct and evaluate a risk prediction model, machine learning was used to screen marker m6A regulators. Based on differentially expressed m6A regulators, molecular subtypes for paediatric septic shock were constructed. Subsequently, the differences in the m6Ascore, heterogeneity of immune cell infiltration, and heterogeneity of biological functions between the different subtypes were analyzed. Finally, real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed to validate the expression of the marker m6A regulators. Results: Fifteen differentially expressed m6A regulators were identified. Six marker m6A regulators, including LRPPRC, ELAVL1, RBM15, CBLL1, FTO, and RBM15B, were screened using the random forest method. The risk prediction model for paediatric septic shock constructed using m6A markers had strong consistency and high clinical practicability. Two subtypes of paediatric septic shock have been identified based on the differential expression pattern of m6A regulators. Significant differences were observed in RNA epigenetics, immune statuses, and biological processes between the two m6A subtypes. Differentially expressed genes between the two subtypes were enriched in cell number homeostasis, redox responses, and innate immune system responses. Finally, the six marker m6A regulators were verified in additional samples. Conclusions: Based on the heterogeneity of m6A methylation-regulated genes, two different subtypes of septic shock in children with different RNA epigenetics, immune statuses, and biological processes were identified, revealing the heterogeneity of the disease largely attributable to differential m6A methylation. The findings will help explore and establish appropriate individualized treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.