Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37842556›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Intraocular foreign body: Characteristics, visual outcomes, and predictive values of ocular trauma score.

Nawat Watanachai, Janejit Choovuthayakorn, Onnisa Nanegrungsunk, Phichayut Phinyo, Susama Chokesuwattanaskul, Krittai Tanasombatkul, Linda Hansapinyo, Phit Upaphong, Tuangprot Porapaktham, Apisara Sangkaew and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nawat WatanachaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Janejit ChoovuthayakornDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Onnisa NanegrungsunkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Phichayut PhinyoClinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Susama ChokesuwattanaskulCenter of Excellence for Cornea and Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Krittai TanasombatkulClinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Linda HansapinyoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Phit UpaphongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Tuangprot PorapakthamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Apisara SangkaewDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Atitaya ApivatthakakulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Paradee KunavisarutDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Voraporn ChaikitmongkolDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Direk PatikulsilaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · THThai Red Cross Society · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Retained intraocular foreign body (IOFB) remains an important cause of acquired visual impairment Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent surgical interventions between January 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of one hundred and sixty-one patients (162 eyes) were recruited. The patients had a mean (standard deviation) age of 47.6 (14.0) years with working male predominance (93.2%). The majority of patients were injured by activities related to grass trimming (63.4%) and metallic objects were the main materials causing injuries (75.7%). Following treatments, the proportion of eyes having vision worse than 20/400 decreased from 126 eyes (77.8%) to 55 eyes (33.9%) at final visit. Ocular trauma score (OTS) had a high potential prediction for final vision in eyes in OTS categories 4 and 5. However, the discordance of final visual acuity distribution was observed in some subgroups of eyes in OTS categories 1 to 3. Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of IOFB related eye injuries in a tertiary care setting. Decision making on treatments should be carefully considered, particularly in eyes in lower OTS categories, in light of a rise in the proportion of patients who experience improved vision after IOFB removal.

Indexed as

CharacteristicsIntraocular foreign bodyOcular trauma scoreVisual outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37842556
PMCPMC10568348
OpenAlexW4387333993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.