ArticleCureus2023
Community-Level Awareness of Proper Immediate Steps for Ocular Chemical Injury in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe human eyes are the most vital sensory organ. Eye injury is the main factor leading to monocular blindness. There is a lack of understanding in the Saudi community regarding the appropriate response to a chemical injury to the eyes. To provide accurate and clear medical information about ocular chemical damage, it is crucial to identify areas where healthcare professionals fall short. To address the gaps in critical knowledge, this study aimed to focus on the Saudi Arabian community to determine if healthcare professionals have fulfilled their responsibility as health promoters in providing education on eye emergencies. We examined the immediate reaction of the study participants to evaluate the community's awareness of chemical eye injuries and immediate management strategies.
objectivesThis study aimed to assess and evaluate the general population's knowledge and awareness of immediate management steps following an ocular chemical injury in Saudi Arabia. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional design was employed. A random sampling method was used to select 2,295 individuals from the Saudi community. Participants completed an electronic closed-ended, pre-validated, anonymous, and self-administered questionnaire.
resultsThe majority of the respondents were females (71.6%) and Saudis (94.5%) aged 18 to 30 years (46.6%). The majority of the respondents correctly stated that eye injuries could cause complications (89.6%) and that common substances that could result in eye injuries are chloride and detergents (93.3%) and battery materials (73.1%). Furthermore, complications after eye injuries could include blindness (80.6%), perforation (44.5%), and scar formation (38.1%). A substantial proportion of the respondents indicated that water should be used to treat chemical injuries due to acidic and alkaline substances (68.1%). However, only a small proportion of the respondents correctly answered that the eyes should be washed for 30 minutes or more after an ocular injury (7.9%).
conclusionsThe overall knowledge levels on injury mechanisms and complications were generally high with a lack of knowledge regarding immediate management for injuries. Therefore, there is a need for targeted educational interventions and training programs to enhance the general public's understanding of immediate management strategies for chemical eye injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.