Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37842448›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Survey of Otolaryngology Residency Programs on Adapting to the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 Transitioning to Pass/Fail.

Lydia C Yang, Andrew Bonner, Om U Patel, William Haynes, Kaitlin Burge, Ishant Yadav, Nicholas J Van Wagoner, Benjamin J Greene, Jessica W Grayson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trends in Otolaryngology Match Dynamics Before and After the USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Transition.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Impact of USMLE Pass/Fail Step 1 Scoring on Current Medical Students.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lydia C YangOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Andrew BonnerOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Om U PatelOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
William HaynesOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Kaitlin BurgeOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Ishant YadavOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Nicholas J Van WagonerMedicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Benjamin J GreeneOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Jessica W GraysonOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives In February 2020, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) announced that the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 licensing examination would change from a numerical score to Pass/Fail (P/F). After implementation, many believe that USMLE-Step 2-Clinical Knowledge (CK) will become an important metric for students applying to otolaryngology (ENT). The purpose of this study is to determine factors important to resident selection after these changes. Methods A survey containing 15 questions related to resident selection practices and how changing USMLE Step 1 to P/F would impact future resident selection was designed. It was distributed to all ENT residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Results Forty percent of programs responded; 66% (95% confidence interval (CI): 51.1%-78.4%) felt that changing Step 1 scoring would not lead to students being more prepared for clinical rotations; 55% believe class rank will increase in significance (95% CI: 35.7%-64.3%). There was also an increase in the importance of Step 2 CK, which had a mean ranking of 10.67 prior to changes in Step 1 scoring and increased to 7.80 after P/F. Conclusions The changes in Step 1 scoring will likely lead to increasing importance of other objective measures like class rank or Step 2 CK. This may defeat the intended purpose put forth by the NBME. Therefore, further guidance on measures correlated with student performance as a resident will be integral to the selection process.

Indexed as

clinical knowledgemedical student examsotolaryngology residencypass/fail usmle step 1step 1 changeunited states medical licensing examination (usmle)usmle step 2 ck

Identifiers

PMID37842448
PMCPMC10576440
OpenAlexW4386742871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.