ReviewCureus2023
Artificial Intelligence's Use in the Diagnosis of Mouth Ulcers: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Oral Mucosa Conditions: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Non-Thermal Plasma vs. Low-Level Laser Therapy for Recurrent Oral Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Vision-based diagnostic gain of ChatGPT-5 and gemini 2.5 pro compared with human experts in oral lesion assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Responses from ChatGPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Grok 4, and Claude Sonnet-4 Chatbots to Questions About Endodontic Iatrogenic Events.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neural network models for diagnosing recurrent aphthous ulcerations from clinical oral images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Performance of AI Chatbots in Preliminary Diagnosis of Maxillofacial Pathologies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based detection of dens invaginatus in panoramic radiographs.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Salivary Biomarkers in the Early Detection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Study Among Dentists of Udaipur Regarding their Awareness Among Artificial Intelligence in Oral Medicine and Radiology: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Deep learning system for the differential diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions through clinical photographic imaging.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Relative Contribution of Trabecular and Cortical Bone to Primary Implant Stability: AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Investigation of Genetic Markers for Predicting Oral Cancer Progression and Patient Outcomes.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Oral Lichen Planus in Patients with Hypothyroidism Versus Nonhypothyroidism.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Salivary Biomarkers in Detecting Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Role of Oral Microbes in Pathogenesis of Oral Lichen Planus.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Accelerating Healing and Reducing Complications in Oral Surgery.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Effect of Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Concentrated Growth Factor on Tissues Around Implants in the Maxillary Anterior Region.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence: A Snapshot of Its Application in Chronic Inflammatory and Autoimmune Skin Diseases.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- AI illuminates paths in oral cancer: transformative insights, diagnostic precision, and personalized strategies.EXCLI journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been cited as being helpful in the diagnosis of diseases, the prediction of prognoses, and the development of patient-specific therapeutic strategies. AI can help dentists, in particular, when they need to make important judgments quickly. It can eliminate human mistakes in making decisions, resulting in superior and consistent medical treatment while lowering the workload on dentists. The existing studies relevant to the study and application of AI in the diagnosis of various forms of mouth ulcers are reviewed in this work. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed in the preparation of the review. There were no rule violations, with the significant exception of the use of a better search method that led to more accurate findings. Using search terms mainly such as AI, oral health, oral ulcers, oral herpes simplex, oral lichen planus, pemphigus vulgaris, recurrent aphthous ulcer (RAU), oral cancer, premalignant and malignant disorders, etc., a comprehensive search was carried out in the reliable sources of literature, namely PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid, Global Health, and PsycINFO. For all papers, exhaustive searches were done using inclusion criteria as well as exclusion criteria between June 28, 2018, and June 28, 2023. An AI framework for the automatic categorization of oral ulcers from oral clinical photographs was developed by the authors, and it performed satisfactorily. The newly designed AI model works better than the current convolutional neural network image categorization techniques and shows a fair level of precision in the classification of oral ulcers. However, despite being useful for identifying oral ulcers, the suggested technique needs a broader set of data for validation and training purposes before being used in clinical settings. Automated OCSCC identification using a deep learning-based technique is a quick, harmless, affordable, and practical approach to evaluating the effectiveness of cancer treatment. The categorization and identification of RAU lesions through the use of non-intrusive oral pictures using the previously developed ResNet50 and YOLOV algorithms demonstrated better accuracy as well as adequate potential for the future, which could be helpful in clinical practice. Moreover, the most reliable projections for the likelihood of the presence or absence of RAU were made by the optimized neural network. The authors also discovered variables associated with RAU that might be used as input information to build artificial neural networks that anticipate RAU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.