ArticleCureus2023
Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Short-Term Photoplethysmography (PPG) Signals Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diagnostics Using Photoplethysmography (PPG): Beyond SpOLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Wearable devices in atrial fibrillation: screening, monitoring, and management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Development of an efficient deep learning model for arrhythmia detection from consumer smartwatches.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Clinically Oriented Review with Engineering Primers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in cardiovascular signal analysis with future directions: a review of machine learning and deep learning models for cardiovascular disease classification based on ECG, PCG, and PPG signals.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Animal and cellular models of atrial fibrillation: a review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- A Deep Learning Approach for Atrial Fibrillation Classification Using Multi-Feature Time Series Data from ECG and PPG.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Atrial fibrillation (AFIB) is a common atrial arrhythmia that affects millions of people worldwide. However, most of the time, AFIB is paroxysmal and can pass unnoticed in medical exams; therefore, regular screening is required. This paper proposes machine learning (ML) methods to detect AFIB from short-term electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) signals. Aim Several experiments were conducted across five different databases, with three of them containing ECG signals and the other two consisting of only PPG signals. Experiments were conducted to investigate the hypothesis that an ML model trained to predict AFIB from ECG segments could be used to predict AFIB from PPG segments. Materials and methods A random forest (RF) ML algorithm achieved the best accuracy and achieved a 90% accuracy rate on the University of Mississippi Medical Center (UMMC) dataset (216 samples) and a 97% accuracy rate on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III datasets (2,134 samples). Results A total of 269,842 signal segments were analyzed across all datasets (212,266 were of normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and 57,576 corresponded to AFIB segments). Conclusions The ability to detect AFIB with significant accuracy using ML algorithms from PPG signals, which can be acquired via non-invasive contact or contactless, is a promising step forward toward the goal of achieving large-scale screening for AFIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.