ArticleCureus2023
The Evaluation of Remote Monitoring Technology Across Participants With Different Skin Tones.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seconds Matter: Rapid Non-Contact Monitoring of Heart and Respiratory Rate from Face Videos.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A hybrid CNN-spectral architecture for non-contact respiratory rate estimation using multi-region optical-flow analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- DeepRespNet: a hybrid attention-recurrent framework for non-contact respiratory rate estimation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany research studies seek to improve vital sign monitoring to enhance the conditions under which doctors and caregivers track patients' health. Non-invasive and contactless monitoring has emerged as an optimal solution for this problem, with telemedicine, self-monitoring, and well-being tools being the next generation of technology in the biomedical field. However, there is worldwide concern about the general purpose and bias toward a certain demographic group of these techniques. In particular, skin tone and the accuracy of monitoring dark skin tone groups have been key questions among researchers, with the lack of results and studies contributing to this uncertainty.
methodsThis paper proposes a benchmark for remote monitoring solutions against a medical device across different skin tone people. Around 330 videos from 90 patients were analyzed, and heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) were compared across different subgroups. The Fitzpatrick scale (1-6) was used to classify participants into three skin tone groups: 1 and 2, 3 and 4, and 5 and 6.
resultsThe results showed that our proposed methodology could estimate heart rate with a mean absolute error of 3 bpm across all samples and subgroups. Moreover, for heart rate variability (HRV) metrics, we achieved the following results: in terms of mobility assistive equipment (MAE), the HRV-inter-beat interval (IBI) was 10 ms, the HRV-standard deviation of normal to normal heartbeats (SDNN) was 14 ms, and the HRV-root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) between normal heartbeats was 22 ms. No significant performance decrease was found for any skin tone group, and there was no error trend toward a certain group.
conclusionsThe study showed that our methodology meets acceptable agreement levels for the proposed metrics. Furthermore, the experiments showed that skin tone did not impact the results, which remained within the same range across all groups. Moreover, it enables the end users to understand their general well-being and improve their overall health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.