ArticleOpen respiratory archives
Safety and Efficacy of Flexible Bronchoscopy in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performances and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Safety of flexible bronchoscopy in elderly patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) During Flexible Bronchoscopy in Adult Patients with Moderate Respiratory Dysfunctions: An Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Unexpected Pneumothorax During Painless Flexible Bronchoscopy Under Remimazolam Sedation: Two Case Reports and a Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a common method used for diagnostic sampling of the thorax. Although the safety and efficacy of FB in the general population are well-established, data on the elderly population are limited. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of FB in elderly people aged ≥80 years. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied elderly patients aged ≥80 years who underwent FB at our hospital between April 2021 and March 2022. Outcomes, such as indications, sampling methods, diagnostic results, and complications, were compared with those of a control group of patients aged 18-79 years. Results: In total, 247 patients (154 men) were included in the study, with 65 and 182 patients in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. The most frequent indication for FB was the presence of a mass or nodule, with transbronchial lung biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration performed in 162 (65.6%), 29 (11.7%), and 36 (15.6%) patients, respectively. FB led to a diagnosis in 36 (57.1%) and 103 (56%) patients in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively, with no significant difference observed. There were no patient deaths or significant differences in the incidence of hemorrhage, hypoxia, pneumothorax, fever, or pneumonia between the two groups. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that FB can be performed effectively and safely in elderly patients aged ≥80 years, similar to non-elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.