Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37842192›Full record

ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2023

Female physician and pregnancy- effect of the amended German maternity protection act on female doctors' careers.

Barbara Puhahn-Schmeiser, Eva K Hennel, Christiane Gross, Heike Raestrup, Astrid Bühren, Mandy Mangler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Endoscopy during pregnancy].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara Puhahn-SchmeiserDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-6373
Eva K HennelDepartment of Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-5785
Christiane GrossGerman Medical Women's Association, Berlin, Germany.
Heike RaestrupGerman Medical Women's Association, Berlin, Germany.
Astrid BührenGerman Medical Women's Association, Berlin, Germany.
Mandy ManglerDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vivantes, Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
German Medical Association · DEAuguste-Viktoria-Klinik · DEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In Germany, the 2018 amended Maternity Protection Act frequently leads to fundamental restrictions for female physicians, especially surgeons, and now even also for students impeding the progress of their careers. Our goal was to assess the current situation for pregnant female physicians and students, respectively, and their perspective on this amendment regarding their career path. Methods: A nationwide survey was conducted in Germany from December 2020 to February 2021. The questionnaire included 790 female physicians and students who were pregnant after the inception of the amended Act. Those women pregnant after the beginning of the corona pandemic were excluded. Results: The survey revealed that two thirds of female physicians worked a maximum of 50% in their previous professional activity as soon as they reported pregnancy. Amongst medical students this amounted up to 72%. 18% of the female physicians and 17% of the female medical students respectively could not follow the sense of these restrictions. 44% of female medical physicians and 33% of female students felt their career impeded. This led up to 43% amongst female medical doctors and 53% amongst female medical students, respectively, who were concerned to announce their pregnancy. As a consequence, pregnancies were reported at 12 weeks in female physicians compared to 19 weeks in medical students. Conclusions: Analyses of the current survey revealed that a relevant number of female physicians and medical students felt impeded in their career path through the application of the amended Maternity Act.

Indexed as

careerfemale medical studentfemale physicianmaternity protection actpregnancysurgery

Identifiers

PMID37842192
PMCPMC10576549
OpenAlexW4361293872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.