ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2023
Optimized nucleus isolation protocol from frozen mouse tissues for single nucleus RNA sequencing application.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-nucleus RNA sequencing uncovers cell type-specific alterations in OSA-related liver injury.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Kidney diseases and single-cell sequencing research: a bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2024.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Single-nucleus transcriptome profiling provides insights into the pathophysiology of OSA-related renal injury.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cellular and Molecular Architecture of Renin-Angiotensin System Signaling in the PVN Under Cardiometabolic Stress.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Making sense of expanding transcriptomic data: network-based approaches for studying reproduction in domestic and wild animal species.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The single cell RNA sequencing technique has been particularly used during the last years, allowing major discoveries. However, the widespread application of this analysis has showed limitations. Indeed, the direct study of fresh tissues is not always feasible, notably in the case of genetically engineered mouse embryo or sensitive tissues whose integrity is affected by classical digestion methods. To overcome these limitations, single nucleus RNA sequencing offers the possibility to work with frozen samples. Thus, single nucleus RNA sequencing can be performed after genotyping-based selection on samples stocked in tissue bank and is applicable to retrospective studies. Therefore, this technique opens the field to a wide range of applications requiring adapted protocols for nucleus isolation according to the tissue considered. Here we developed a protocol of nucleus isolation from frozen murine placenta and pancreas. These two complex tissues were submitted to a combination of enzymatic and manual dissociation before undergoing different steps of washing and centrifugation. The entire protocol was performed with products usually present in a research lab. Before starting the sequencing process, nuclei were sorted by flow cytometry. The results obtained validate the efficiency of this protocol which is easy to set up and does not require the use of commercial kits. This specificity makes it adaptable to different organs and species. The association of this protocol with single nucleus RNA sequencing allows the study of complex samples that resist classical lysis methods due to the presence of fibrotic or fatty tissue, such as fibrotic kidney, tumors, embryonic tissues or fatty pancreas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.