Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37842080›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2023

A Pilot Study Examining Feasibility and Initial Efficacy of Remotely Delivered Cognitive Adaptation Training.

Dawn I Velligan, Feiyu Li, Veronica Sebastian, Cory Kennedy, Jim Mintz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dawn I VelliganDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Feiyu LiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Veronica SebastianDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Cory KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Jim MintzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.

Funding

Cognitive Adaptation Training: Effectiveness in real-world settings and Mechanisms of Action (CAT-EM)R01MH117101 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI VELLIGAN, DAWN IRENE · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is an evidence-based treatment that uses environmental supports including signs, text messages, checklists, smart pill containers, and the organization of belongings to bypass cognitive and motivational impairments and to cue adaptive behavior in the home or work environment. We developed and tested a remote version of CAT to make the treatment available more broadly. Because CAT is focused on working with the individual in their home environment to establish supports, CAT may not be as easy to translate into an effective virtual treatment as talk-therapies. Fifty-six members of managed care were assigned to or given their treatment preference for CAT or Remote CAT (R-CAT) for 6 months. In-person or virtual pill counts were conducted monthly and assessments of habit-formation, symptoms, functioning, and satisfaction were administered every 2 months by independent raters. Analyses using mixed models with repeated measures focused on pre-planned evaluations of within-group change. Adherence improved significantly in R-CAT, functioning improved significantly in CAT and both groups improved significantly on measures of habit-formation and symptoms across 6 months. Higher functioning individuals appeared to choose R-CAT. Satisfaction with treatment was very high in both groups. R-CAT appears to be a potentially effective treatment, particularly for medication follow-though. However, in contrast to decades of previous research, fewer than 20% of eligible Medicaid recipients agreed to participate in the study. This may have been due to recruitment during and immediately post-pandemic.

Indexed as

environmental supportshabit-formationremote cognitive adaptation trainingserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID37842080
PMCPMC10576524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.