Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37842077›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Lymphatic Mapping with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis Surgery: How We Do It.

Samuel Jang, Samyd S Bustos, Austin D Chen, Eugene E Zheng, Gina K Hesley, Nathan J Brinkman, Jill S Carter, Nho V Tran, Vahe Fahradyan, Christine U Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lymphatic Mapping for LVA with Noncontrast Lymphatic Ultrasound: How We Do It.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel JangFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Samyd S BustosDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Austin D ChenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Eugene E ZhengDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Gina K HesleyFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Nathan J BrinkmanDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Jill S CarterFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Nho V TranDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Vahe FahradyanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Christine U LeeFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery is an effective surgery for the treatment of lymphedema in the extremities. Indocyanine green lymphography is the reference standard for visualizing lymphatics for LVA surgery, but it has several limitations; most notably, superficial dermal congestion can mask deeper lymphatic vessels. To overcome the limitations, we add contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography. We have previously reported that CEUS lymphography can identify lymphatic vessels for LVA surgery that indocyanine green lymphography does not. Here, we describe how we perform CEUS lymphography, including workflow, technique, and documentation. Before informed consent, the patient must be screened for possible adverse reactions to microbubbles. The procedure involves multiple intradermal injections of the microbubble agent at various sites along the extremity. After each injection, imaging for microbubble uptake by lymphatic vessels is performed using an ultrasound scanner with contrast-specific software. We use sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres (Lumason/SonoVue; Bracco Suisse SA), but we are investigating the performance of other Food & Drug Administration-approved microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography. Having a systematic approach to marking the skin can mitigate the hindrance of marking over ultrasound coupling gel. Another benefit of CEUS lymphography is the rapid identification of neighboring veins compatible in size and location for anastomosis. We hold regular scheduled multidisciplinary meetings for coordination of care, discussion of outcomes, quality assurance, and ongoing innovation.

Identifiers

PMID37842077
PMCPMC10569760
OpenAlexW4387571423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.