ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Globus pallidus/putamen T
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Inherited Hyperbilirubinemia (2025).Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a multidimensional nomogram integrating biomarkers and neurobehavioral scores.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Diagnosing acute bilirubin encephalopathy in neonates using MRI-based deep learning model.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Association of T1-weighted hyperintensity with timing of peak bilirubin levels in neonates with hyperbilirubinemia.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- [Expert consensus on the diagnosis and therapy of inherited hyperbilirubinemia (version 2025)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Exploring the feasibility and clinical impact of ultrasound microvascular flow imaging in detecting brain injury in hyperbilirubinemia neonates.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to investigate the relationship between the globus pallidus/putamen T1 weighted image (T Methods: A total of 77 full-term neonates with ABE were scored according to bilirubin-induced neurological dysfunction and divided into mild, moderate, and severe groups. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed and the G/P ratio was recorded. The follow-up reexaminations were carried out at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the initial examination. The neonates were then divided into two groups, the good prognosis group and the kernicterus spectrum disorder (KSD) group, according to the evaluation of Gesell Developmental Schedules and Brainstem Audio Electric Potential at 6 months. Main findings: The differences of G/P ratios were statistically significant, not only among the mild, moderate, and severe ABE groups for the initial examinations but also between the KSD and the good prognosis groups for the follow-up reexaminations. Therefore, the ABE grading model and prognosis predicting model could be established based on the G/P ratio. In the KSD group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the G/P ratio-based predicting model was 93.5%, the optimal critical point was 1.29, the sensitivity was 88.2%, and the specificity was 93.3%. Conclusions: The G/P ratio can be used as an indicating parameter for both the clinical grading of neonatal ABE and the assessment of neonatal ABE prognosis. Specifically, the G/P ratio greater than 1.29 indicates a KSD of neonatal ABE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.