ArticleIEEE transactions on information theory2023
On Support Recovery with Sparse CCA: Information Theoretic and Computational Limits.
Article in IEEE transactions on information theory, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying genes associated with disease outcomes using joint sparse canonical correlation analysis-An application in renal clear cell carcinoma.Genetic epidemiology · 2024Article
- On statistical inference with high-dimensional sparse CCA.Information and inference : a journal of the IMA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we consider asymptotically exact support recovery in the context of high dimensional and sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA). Our main results describe four regimes of interest based on information theoretic and computational considerations. In regimes of "low" sparsity we describe a simple, general, and computationally easy method for support recovery, whereas in a regime of "high" sparsity, it turns out that support recovery is information theoretically impossible. For the sake of information theoretic lower bounds, our results also demonstrate a non-trivial requirement on the "minimal" size of the nonzero elements of the canonical vectors that is required for asymptotically consistent support recovery. Subsequently, the regime of "moderate" sparsity is further divided into two subregimes. In the lower of the two sparsity regimes, we show that polynomial time support recovery is possible by using a sharp analysis of a co-ordinate thresholding [1] type method. In contrast, in the higher end of the moderate sparsity regime, appealing to the "Low Degree Polynomial" Conjecture [2], we provide evidence that polynomial time support recovery methods are inconsistent. Finally, we carry out numerical experiments to compare the efficacy of various methods discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.