Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841966›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

Modality-Specificity of the Neural Correlates of Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Demand.

Mackenzie Philips, Sarah M Schneck, Deborah F Levy, Stephen M Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Situating word deafness within aphasia recovery: A case report.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mackenzie PhilipsDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sarah M SchneckDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-4431
Deborah F LevyDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-2525
Stephen M WilsonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9884-2852

Funding

Neural Correlates of Recovery from Aphasia After StrokeR01DC013270 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen M Wilson, Michael R de Riesthal · 2014 to 2026
$6.3M
An Adaptive Semantic Paradigm for Valid and Reliable Language Mapping in AphasiaR21DC016080 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILSON, STEPHEN M · 2017 to 2018
$435k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013270NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging studies of language processing in clinical populations can be complicated to interpret for several reasons, one being the difficulty of matching the effortfulness of processing across individuals or tasks. To better understand how effortful linguistic processing is reflected in functional activity, we investigated the neural correlates of task difficulty in linguistic and non-linguistic contexts in the auditory modality and then compared our findings to a recent analogous experiment in the visual modality in a different cohort. Nineteen neurologically normal individuals were scanned with fMRI as they performed a linguistic task (semantic matching) and a non-linguistic task (melodic matching), each with two levels of difficulty. We found that left hemisphere frontal and temporal language regions, as well as the right inferior frontal gyrus, were modulated by linguistic demand and not by non-linguistic demand. This was broadly similar to what was previously observed in the visual modality. In contrast, the multiple demand (MD) network, a set of brain regions thought to support cognitive flexibility in many contexts, was modulated neither by linguistic demand nor by non-linguistic demand in the auditory modality. This finding was in striking contradistinction to what was previously observed in the visual modality, where the MD network was robustly modulated by both linguistic and non-linguistic demand. Our findings suggest that while the language network is modulated by linguistic demand irrespective of modality, modulation of the MD network by linguistic demand is not inherent to linguistic processing, but rather depends on specific task factors.

Indexed as

accuracyaphasialinguistic demandmultiple demand networkreaction timetask difficulty

Identifiers

PMID37841966
PMCPMC10575553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.