Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841905›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023

Evaluating the utility of post-reduction imaging for simple hip joint dislocations: Is computed tomography always necessary?

Samuel D Stegelmann, Roman Rahmani, Matthew Tille, Samuel Eaddy, Seth Phillips

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel D StegelmannHCA Medical City Healthcare UNT-TCU GME (Denton), Denton, TX, USA.
Roman RahmaniMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry Street, Suite #10, Toledo, OH, 43608, USA.
Matthew TilleMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry Street, Suite #10, Toledo, OH, 43608, USA.
Samuel EaddyMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry Street, Suite #10, Toledo, OH, 43608, USA.
Seth PhillipsMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry Street, Suite #10, Toledo, OH, 43608, USA.
Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center · USMedical City Dallas Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Following closed reduction of hip dislocations, computed tomography (CT) is considered standard of care to identify occult fractures or intra-articular loose bodies that may be missed on X-ray. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of post-reduction X-rays and the usefulness of subsequent post-reduction CT imaging. Methods: All patients presenting to our hospital system for traumatic hip dislocations from 2013 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Participants were included if they had a simple dislocation of a native hip, underwent closed reduction, and received post-reduction X-ray and CT imaging. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the detection of associated fractures and intraarticular loose bodies by post-reduction X-ray, using CT as a reference standard. Results: Thirty-five subjects with a mean age of 26 years were included. Post-reduction CT revealed 6 fractures and 3 loose bodies, whereas post-reduction X-ray identified 3/6 (50%) fractures and 3/3 (100%) loose bodies. Four cases received operative management, all of which were identified by X-ray. Post-reduction X-ray had a sensitivity of 67% for identifying pathology that was subsequently found on CT, and a sensitivity of 100% for identifying pathology requiring surgery. Of the 13 cases with pre-reduction CT scans, none had new findings identified on post-reduction CT. Conclusions: Post-reduction X-rays are effective in the evaluation of acute pathology associated with closed reduction of traumatic hip dislocations, especially for cases requiring operative management. Our findings suggest that if a fracture or loose body was not identified on post-reduction X-ray, a post-reduction CT added no value in surgical decision-making and was not necessary.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyCTHip dislocationRadiographsReductionX-ray

Identifiers

PMID37841905
PMCPMC10570626
OpenAlexW4387191363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.