ArticleFrontiers in big data2023
A solution and practice for combining multi-source heterogeneous data to construct enterprise knowledge graph.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A causal discovery-based adaptive fusion algorithm for multi-source heterogeneous knowledge graphs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on intelligent decision support platform for tourism enterprises based on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Source Feature-Fusion Method for the Seismic Data of Cultural Relics Based on Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The knowledge graph is one of the essential infrastructures of artificial intelligence. It is a challenge for knowledge engineering to construct a high-quality domain knowledge graph for multi-source heterogeneous data. We propose a complete process framework for constructing a knowledge graph that combines structured data and unstructured data, which includes data processing, information extraction, knowledge fusion, data storage, and update strategies, aiming to improve the quality of the knowledge graph and extend its life cycle. Specifically, we take the construction process of an enterprise knowledge graph as an example and integrate enterprise register information, litigation-related information, and enterprise announcement information to enrich the enterprise knowledge graph. For the unstructured text, we improve existing model to extract triples and the F1-score of our model reached 72.77%. The number of nodes and edges in our constructed enterprise knowledge graph reaches 1,430,000 and 3,170,000, respectively. Furthermore, for each type of multi-source heterogeneous data, we apply corresponding methods and strategies for information extraction and data storage and carry out a detailed comparative analysis of graph databases. From the perspective of practical use, the informative enterprise knowledge graph and its timely update can serve many actual business needs. Our proposed enterprise knowledge graph has been deployed in HuaRong RongTong (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. and is used by the staff as a powerful tool for corporate due diligence. The key features are reported and analyzed in the case study. Overall, this paper provides an easy-to-follow solution and practice for domain knowledge graph construction, as well as demonstrating its application in corporate due diligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.