Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841810›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2023

Unveiling the Impact of Lean Leadership on Continuous Improvement Maturity: A Scoping Review.

Jesse Jorian Hilverda, Oskar Roemeling, Edin Smailhodzic, Kjeld Harald Aij, Eveline Hage, Amal Fakha

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The outcomes of Lean management in a large academic hospital in Finland in 2018-2023: a qualitative study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The maturity of lean management in a large academic medical center in Finland: a qualitative study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jesse Jorian HilverdaDepartment of Audit & Risk Management, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Oskar RoemelingDepartment of Innovation, Management & Strategy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-1129
Edin SmailhodzicDepartment of Innovation, Management & Strategy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Kjeld Harald AijDijkzigt, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Eveline HageDepartment of Innovation, Management & Strategy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Amal FakhaDepartment of Innovation, Management & Strategy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Lean Management (LM) is a process improvement approach with growing interest from healthcare organizations. Obtaining a culture of continuous improvement is a primary objective of LM, and a culture of continuous improvement indicates a mature LM approach, and here leadership plays a central role. However, a comprehensive overview of leadership activities influencing LM maturity is lacking. This study aims to identify leadership activities associated with continuous improvement and, thus, LM, maturity. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a scoping literature review of peer-reviewed articles was conducted in twenty healthcare management journals. The search provided 466 articles published up until 2023. During the selection process, 23 studies were included in the review. The leadership activities related to continuous improvement maturity were identified using the grounded theory approach and data coding. Results: The analysis highlighted a total of 58 leadership activities distributed across nine themes of LM leadership. Next, analysing leadership activities concerning the different maturity levels revealed three maturity stages: beginner, intermediate, and expert. Based on the findings, we propose a framework that guides suitable leadership activities at the various stages of LM maturity. The framework provides leaders in healthcare with a practical overview of actions to facilitate the growth of the LM approach, and the related propositions offer academics a theoretical basis for future studies. Conclusion: This review presents the first comprehensive overview of LM leadership activities in relation to continuous improvement and LM maturity. To enhance LM maturity, leaders are encouraged to consider their leadership style, (clinical) stakeholder involvement, alignment with the organizational strategy, and their role in promoting employee autonomy.

Indexed as

continuous improvementleadership activitieslean adoptionlean healthcarelean leadershiplean management

Identifiers

PMID37841810
PMCPMC10576566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.