ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2023
Radical decompression without fusion for L5 radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The highest incidence of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) occurs in the L5-S1 segment and its anatomical features differ from those of other segments. Few previous reports have exhaustively assessed surgical outcomes after decompression surgery, limiting the materials to patients with LFS at the L5-S1 segment. We aimed to prospectively investigate instability and neurological improvement following our novel surgical technique for LFS at L5-S1, named "radical decompression" of the nerve root. Methods: Patients with foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 who underwent surgery using our technique were prospectively evaluated two years postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were evaluated preoperatively and two years postoperatively. The following radiological parameters at L5-S1 were measured: lateral translation, sagittal translation, the difference in sagittal translation (DST) between flexion and extension, disc wedging angle, lordotic angle, the difference in lordotic angle (DLA) between flexion and extension, and disc height. Pre- and postoperative data were compared using paired Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in this analysis. The JOA scores improved in all patients. The mean preoperative and two-year postoperative JOA scores were 14.5±3.2 (range, 8-21) and 24.3±3.3 (range, 18-29), respectively (P<0.01). All JOABPEQ categories improved two years postoperatively (P<0.05). None of the patients underwent revision surgery. No significant changes were observed in any of the radiological parameters. No significant differences in the changes in each parameter before and after surgery were found between groups D and ND. Conclusions: Our surgical technique resulted in good neurological recovery and was associated with a low risk of postoperative segmental instability, regardless of additional discectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.