ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2023
Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and treatment strategies for adjacent segment disease following spinal fusion (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- Trends in spinal implant utilization and pricing.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompression to avoid the need for instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome between older and younger patients undergoing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis. Methods: This is a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes. One hundred and fifty-four patients underwent 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 87 patients ≤65 years of age who underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion; Group 2: 67 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent the same procedures with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pedicle-screw augmentation. Mean follow-up 27.47 months (range, 76-24 months). Results: Mean age was 49.1 years old (range, 24-65) for the younger group and 77.8 (range, 75-86) in the elderly group. Patients ≥75 years of age showed higher preoperative comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiology, ASA: 1.7 Conclusions: Osteoporosis represents a major consideration before performing spine surgery. Despite an obvious increased risk of complications in elderly patients, PMMA-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw instrumentation in spine fusion represents a safe and effective surgical treatment option to elderly patients with poor bone quality. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication in otherwise appropriately selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.