Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841781›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2023

The use of machine learning for predicting candidates for outpatient spine surgery: a review.

Ian J Wellington, Owen P Karsmarski, Kyle V Murphy, Matthew E Shuman, Mitchell K Ng, Christopher L Antonacci

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07788872 (MORESP, MOre REalistic Spine Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07788872 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

MORESP, MOre REalistic Spine Patients: Assessing the Effect of a Predictive Tool ("Dialogue Support") in Relation to Expectations, Post-surgical Outcomes and Surgery Cancellations in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disorders, as Well as Inter-rater Reliability Between Surgeons.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2026 to 2031Enrolled440ConditionsSpinal Stenosis Lumbar, Disc Herniation, Lumbar, Degenrative Disc DiseaseArmsDialogue Support Consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Machine learning clustering reveals risk factors of mechanical complications requiring revision in adult spinal deformity surgery: a 2-year follow-up study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian J WellingtonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Owen P KarsmarskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Kyle V MurphyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Matthew E ShumanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Mitchell K NgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Christopher L AntonacciDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While spine surgery has historically been performed in the inpatient setting, in recent years there has been growing interest in performing certain cervical and lumbar spine procedures on an outpatient basis. While conducting these procedures in the outpatient setting may be preferable for both the surgeon and the patient, appropriate patient selection is crucial. The employment of machine learning techniques for data analysis and outcome prediction has grown in recent years within spine surgery literature. Machine learning is a form of statistics often applied to large datasets that creates predictive models, with minimal to no human intervention, that can be applied to previously unseen data. Machine learning techniques may outperform traditional logistic regression with regards to predictive accuracy when analyzing complex datasets. Researchers have applied machine learning to develop algorithms to aid in patient selection for spinal surgery and to predict postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, there has been increasing interest in using machine learning to assist in the selection of patients who may be appropriate candidates for outpatient cervical and lumbar spine surgery. The goal of this review is to discuss the current literature utilizing machine learning to predict appropriate patients for cervical and lumbar spine surgery, candidates for outpatient spine surgery, and outcomes following these procedures.

Indexed as

machine learningoutpatientSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID37841781
PMCPMC10570640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.