Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841672›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2023

Consensus Paper: Current Perspectives on Abstract Concepts and Future Research Directions.

Briony Banks, Anna M Borghi, Raphaël Fargier, Chiara Fini, Domicele Jonauskaite, Claudia Mazzuca, Martina Montalti, Caterina Villani, Greg Woodin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Water Is and Is Not HCognitive science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Sounds of the future and past.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Briony BanksDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3666-0222
Anna M BorghiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-8408
Raphaël FargierDepartment of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-0238
Chiara FiniDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-4745
Domicele JonauskaiteFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-9766
Claudia MazzucaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1568-2425
Martina MontaltiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7310-8897
Caterina VillaniDepartment of Modern Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University of Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4537-7306
Greg WoodinDepartment of English Language and Linguistics, University of Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-4991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

concepts are relevant to a wide range of disciplines, including cognitive science, linguistics, psychology, cognitive, social, and affective neuroscience, and philosophy. This consensus paper synthesizes the work and views of researchers in the field, discussing current perspectives on theoretical and methodological issues, and recommendations for future research. In this paper, we urge researchers to go beyond the traditional abstract-concrete dichotomy and consider the multiple dimensions that characterize concepts (e.g., sensorimotor experience, social interaction, conceptual metaphor), as well as the mediating influence of linguistic and cultural context on conceptual representations. We also promote the use of interactive methods to investigate both the comprehension and production of abstract concepts, while also focusing on individual differences in conceptual representations. Overall, we argue that abstract concepts should be studied in a more nuanced way that takes into account their complexity and diversity, which should permit us a fuller, more holistic understanding of abstract cognition.

Indexed as

abstract conceptscontextualityindividual differencesinteractive methodsmultidimensionalitysocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID37841672
PMCPMC10573588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.