Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841668›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2023

Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper.

Anita Körner, Mauricio Castillo, Linda Drijvers, Martin H Fischer, Fritz Günther, Marco Marelli, Olesia Platonova, Luca Rinaldi, Samuel Shaki, James P Trujillo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anita KörnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Kassel, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-2118
Mauricio CastilloCenter for Basic Research in Psychology, University of the Republic of Uruguay, UY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-3697
Linda DrijversMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, NL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9154-7033
Martin H FischerDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3818-7272
Fritz GüntherDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9205-6786
Marco MarelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, IT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5831-5441
Olesia PlatonovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7592-2868
Luca RinaldiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, IT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2017-6102
Samuel ShakiDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, Ariel University, IL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2340-5401
James P TrujilloMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, NL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4713-376X
Oksana TsaregorodtsevaDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-3992
Arthur M GlenbergDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-3687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language processing is influenced by sensorimotor experiences. Here, we review behavioral evidence for embodied and grounded influences in language processing across six linguistic levels of granularity. We examine (a) sub-word features, discussing grounded influences on iconicity (systematic associations between word form and meaning); (b) words, discussing boundary conditions and generalizations for the simulation of color, sensory modality, and spatial position; (c) sentences, discussing boundary conditions and applications of action direction simulation; (d) texts, discussing how the teaching of simulation can improve comprehension in beginning readers; (e) conversations, discussing how multi-modal cues improve turn taking and alignment; and (f) text corpora, discussing how distributional semantic models can reveal how grounded and embodied knowledge is encoded in texts. These approaches are converging on a convincing account of the psychology of language, but at the same time, there are important criticisms of the embodied approach and of specific experimental paradigms. The surest way forward requires the adoption of a wide array of scientific methods. By providing complimentary evidence, a combination of multiple methods on various levels of granularity can help us gain a more complete understanding of the role of embodiment and grounding in language processing.

Indexed as

embodied cognitiongrounded cognitionlanguagesituated cognition

Identifiers

PMID37841668
PMCPMC10573585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.