Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841660›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2023

Collagen type I-based recombinant peptide promotes bone regeneration in rat critical-size calvarial defects by enhancing osteoclast activity at late stages of healing.

Ichinnorov Chimedtseren, Shoji Yamahara, Yasunori Akiyama, Masaaki Ito, Yoshinori Arai, Anar Erdene Gantugs, Nagato Nastume, Taku Wakita, Takahiro Hiratsuka, Masaki Honda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ichinnorov ChimedtserenDivision of Research and Treatment for Oral and Maxillofacial Congenital Anomalies, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8651, Japan.
Shoji YamaharaDepartment of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 1-100 Kusumoto-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8650, Japan.
Yasunori AkiyamaDivision of Research and Treatment for Oral and Maxillofacial Congenital Anomalies, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8651, Japan.
Masaaki ItoDivision of Research and Treatment for Oral and Maxillofacial Congenital Anomalies, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8651, Japan.
Yoshinori AraiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.
Anar Erdene GantugsDivision of Research and Treatment for Oral and Maxillofacial Congenital Anomalies, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8651, Japan.
Nagato NastumeDivision of Research and Treatment for Oral and Maxillofacial Congenital Anomalies, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8651, Japan.
Taku WakitaBio Science & Engineering Laboratory, FUJIFILM Corporation, 577 Ushijima, Kaisei-machi, Ashigarakami-gun, Kanagawa 258-8577, Japan.
Takahiro HiratsukaBio Science & Engineering Laboratory, FUJIFILM Corporation, 577 Ushijima, Kaisei-machi, Ashigarakami-gun, Kanagawa 258-8577, Japan.
Masaki HondaDepartment of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 1-100 Kusumoto-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8650, Japan.
Jorge Luis Montenegro RaudalesDepartment of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 1-100 Kusumoto-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8650, Japan.
Aichi Gakuin University · JPFujifilm (Japan) · JPNihon University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We recently demonstrated the bone-forming potential of medium-cross-linked recombinant collagen peptide (mRCP) in animal models of bone defects. However, these studies were limited to a 4-week observation period; therefore, in the present study, we aimed to further evaluate mRCP as a suitable bone graft material for the alveolar cleft by analyzing its bone-forming potential, osteogenic-inducing ability, and biodegradation over an extended period of 12 weeks, using a rat critical-size calvarial defect model. Methods: Using Sprague-Dawley rats, we created critical-size calvarial defects through a surgical procedure. The defects were then filled with 3 mg of mRCP (mRCP group) or 18 mg of Cytrans® (CA) granules, which has a carbonate apatite-based composition resembling natural bone, was used as a reference material (CA group). For negative control, the defects were left untreated. Bone volume, total bone volume (bone volume including CA granules), and bone mineral density (BMD) in the defect were assessed using micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after implantation. Using histomorphometric analyses of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections, we measured the amount of newly formed bone and total newly formed bone (new bone including CA granules) in the entire defect site, as well as the amount of newly formed bone in the central side, two peripheral sides (left and right), periosteal (top) side, and dura mater (bottom) side. In addition, we measured the amount of residual bone graft material in the defect. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts in the newly formed bone were detected using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, respectively. Results: Bone volume in the mRCP group increased over time and was significantly larger at 8 and 12 weeks after surgery than at 4 weeks. The bone volume in the mRCP group was greater than that of the CA and control groups at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after implantation, and while the total bone volume was greater in the CA group after 4 and 8 weeks, the mRCP group had comparable levels of total bone volume to that of the CA group at 12 weeks after implantation. The BMD of the mRCP group reached similar levels to native calvaria bone at the same time point. H&E-stained sections revealed a larger amount of newly formed bone 12 weeks after implantation in the mRCP group compared to that of the CA and control groups. The total newly formed bone at 12 weeks after implantation was on par with that in the CA group. Furthermore, at the defect site, the area of newly formed bone was larger on the peripheral and dura mater sides. Notably, the number of osteoclasts in the mRCP group was higher than in the CA and control groups and peaked 8 weeks after implantation, which coincided with the timing of the greatest resorption of mRCP. Although the ALP-positive area was greater in the mRCP group compared to other groups, we did not detect any significant changes in the number of osteoblasts over time. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the bone-forming potential of mRCP over an extended period of 12 weeks, suggesting that mRCP sufficiently resists resorption to promote bone formation through induction of osteoclast activation in the late stages of the healing period.

Indexed as

Bone graft materialBone regenerationCalvariaOsteoblastOsteoclastRecombinant human collagen peptide

Identifiers

PMID37841660
PMCPMC10570703
OpenAlexW4387419592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.