Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841655›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2023

Administration of an excessive dosage of covid-19 pfizer vaccine in an infant: Case report of clinical and immune responses.

Jorgete Maria E Silva, Jhefferson Barbosa Guimarães, Soraya Regina Abu Jamra, Beatrice Santanastasio Mirante, Carlos Fabiano Capato, Daniel Macedo de Melo Jorge, Benedito Antônio Lopes da Fonseca

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorgete Maria E SilvaAssistant Physician in Immunoallergy, Clinical Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Jhefferson Barbosa GuimarãesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Soraya Regina Abu JamraAssistant Physician in Immunoallergy, Clinical Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Beatrice Santanastasio MiranteAssistant Physician in Immunoallergy, Clinical Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Carlos Fabiano CapatoVirology Research Center, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Macedo de Melo JorgeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, MI, United States.
Benedito Antônio Lopes da FonsecaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/Case report: We describe the case of a 6-month-old female infant who received the equivalent of 6 adult doses of the COVID-19 Pfizer vaccine due to an immunization error. The patient underwent clinical and laboratory evaluations from the time of vaccination error (January 2022) until November 2022. In the first three days after immunization, she presented with low-grade fever (38 °C) and mild pain and induration at the injection site. She showed no other symptoms afterwards. Laboratory tests were within normal limits for age, except for an elevated D-dimer (3.71 ug/mL; normal: up to 0.5 ug/mL) and as the echocardiogram and electrocardiogram were within normal limits as well, no interventions were instituted at that moment. On the tenth day, immune response evaluation showed a strong expression of cytokines related to the Th2 profile and a well-controlled inflammatory state. Forty-three days after the vaccine administration inflammation status remained, with a predominance of cellular immune response, IFN-γ expression increased compared to the previous evaluation, and a robust antiviral state was in place. After 90 days, immune response evaluation showed a significant reduction in the inflammatory state, still with a predominance of the cellular immune response. Clinically, the patient remained well, with no other noteworthy intercurrences, until the last appointment in November 2022. This child has had no evidence of a severe adverse effect associated to the vaccine overdose. Conclusion: The close follow-up of this case of vaccination error demonstrated that the COVID-19 Pfizer was safe and immunogenic in this individual, noting careful monitoring and followup of these vaccine administration errors is crucial.

Indexed as

Antibodies neutralizingCovid 19 vaccinesImmune systemImmunizationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37841655
PMCPMC10568082
OpenAlexW4387345203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.