ArticleiScience2023
Profiling the inflammatory bowel diseases using genetics, serum biomarkers, and smoking information.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- State of omics-based microbial diagnostics of CRC.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Current Treatments, Emerging Therapeutics, and Natural Remedies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Performance Evaluation of Open Channel Buhlmann Fecal Calprotectin Turbo Assay on Abbott Alinity C Analyzer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- HSPA9 reduction exacerbates symptoms and cell death in DSS-Induced inflammatory colitis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are two etiologically related yet distinctive subtypes of the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Differentiating CD from UC can be challenging using conventional clinical approaches in a subset of patients. We designed and evaluated a novel molecular-based prediction model aggregating genetics, serum biomarkers, and tobacco smoking information to assist the diagnosis of CD and UC in over 30,000 samples. A joint model combining genetics, serum biomarkers and smoking explains 46% (42-50%, 95% CI) of phenotypic variation. Despite modest overlaps with serum biomarkers, genetics makes unique contributions to distinguishing IBD subtypes. Smoking status only explains 1% (0-6%, 95% CI) of the phenotypic variance suggesting it may not be an effective biomarker. This study reveals that molecular-based models combining genetics, serum biomarkers, and smoking information could complement current diagnostic strategies and help classify patients based on biologic state rather than imperfect clinical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.