Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Structural enrichment for laboratory mice: exploring the effects of novelty and complexity.

Lena Bohn, Louisa Bierbaum, Niklas Kästner, Vanessa Tabea von Kortzfleisch, Sylvia Kaiser, Norbert Sachser, S Helene Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Voluntary Wheel Running an Effective Intervention in the Management of Excessive Food Usage in CD-1 Mice (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lena BohnDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Institute of Neuro- and Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Louisa BierbaumDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Institute of Neuro- and Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Niklas KästnerDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Institute of Neuro- and Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Vanessa Tabea von KortzfleischDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Institute of Neuro- and Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Sylvia KaiserDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Institute of Neuro- and Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Norbert SachserDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Institute of Neuro- and Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
S Helene RichterDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Institute of Neuro- and Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing structural enrichment is a widespread refinement method for laboratory rodents and other animals in captivity. So far, animal welfare research has mostly focused on the effect of increased complexity either by accumulating or combining different enrichment items. However, increasing complexity is not the only possibility to refine housing conditions. Another refinement option is to increase novelty by regularly exchanging known enrichment items with new ones. In the present study, we used pair-housed non-breeding female C57BL/6J and DBA/2N mice to investigate the effect of novelty when applying structural enrichment. We used a double cage system, in which one cage served as home cage and the other as extra cage. While the home cage was furnished in the same way for all mice, in the extra cage we either provided only space with no additional enrichment items (space), a fixed set of enrichment items (complexity), or a changing set of enrichment items (novelty). Over 5  weeks, we assessed spontaneous behaviors, body weight, and extra cage usage as indicators of welfare and preference. Our main results showed that mice with access to structurally enriched extra cages (complexity and novelty) spent more time in their extra cages and complexity mice had lower latencies to enter their extra cages than mice with access to the extra cages without any structural enrichment (space). This indicates that the mice preferred the structurally enriched extra cages over the structurally non-enriched space cages. We found only one statistically significant difference between the novelty and complexity condition: during week 3, novelty mice spent more time in their extra cages than complexity mice. Although we did not detect any other significant differences between the novelty and complexity condition in the present study, more research is required to further explore the potential benefits of novelty beyond complexity.

Indexed as

animal welfarecomplexityenrichmenthousing conditionnoveltyrefinement

Identifiers

PMID37841462
PMCPMC10570735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.