Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841335›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Evaluation of zero counts to better understand the discrepancies between bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq platforms.

Joanna Zyla, Anna Papiez, Jun Zhao, Rihao Qu, Xiaotong Li, Yuval Kluger, Joanna Polanska, Christos Hatzis, Lajos Pusztai, Michal Marczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of dropouts in scRNAseq dense neighborhood analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joanna ZylaDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland.
Anna PapiezDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland.
Jun ZhaoComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Rihao QuComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Xiaotong LiBreast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Yuval KlugerComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Joanna PolanskaDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland.
Christos HatzisBreast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Lajos PusztaiBreast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Michal MarczykDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in sample preparation and sequencing technology have made it possible to profile the transcriptomes of individual cells using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq). Compared to bulk RNA-Seq data, single-cell data often contain a higher percentage of zero reads, mainly due to lower sequencing depth per cell, which affects mostly measurements of low-expression genes. However, discrepancies between platforms are observed regardless of expression level. Using four paired datasets with multiple samples each, we investigated technical and biological factors that can contribute to this expression shift. Using two separate machine learning models we found that, in addition to expression level, RNA integrity, gene or UTR3 length, and the number of transcripts potentially also influence the occurrence of zeros. These findings could enable the development of novel analytical methods for cross-platform expression shift correction. We also identified genes and biological pathways in our diverse datasets that consistently showed differences when assessed at the single cell versus bulk level to assist in interpreting analysis across transcriptomic platforms. At the gene level, 25 genes (0.12%) were found in all datasets as discordant, but at the pathway level, 7 pathways (2.02%) showed shared enrichment in discordant genes.

Indexed as

Dropout rateSingle-cell sequencingTechnical factorsZeros

Identifiers

PMID37841335
PMCPMC10568495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.