Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841304›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2023

biomArker-guided Duration of Antibiotic treatment in hospitalised Patients with suspecTed Sepsis (ADAPT-Sepsis): A protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Paul Dark, Gavin D Perkins, Ronan McMullan, Danny McAuley, Anthony C Gordon, Jonathan Clayton, Dipesh Mistry, Keith Young, Scott Regan, Nicola McGowan and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Changing the Dial on Pathogen Detection in SBP.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Paul DarkDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Critical Care Unit, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford Care Organisation, Greater Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-0164
Gavin D PerkinsWarwick Medical School, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Ronan McMullanWellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Danny McAuleyWellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Anthony C GordonAnaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-547X
Jonathan ClaytonClinical Biochemistry Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston Lancashire, UK.
Dipesh MistryWarwick Medical School, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Keith YoungWarwick Medical School, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Scott ReganWarwick Medical School, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nicola McGowanWarwick Medical School, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Matt StevensonSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield Western Bank, Sheffield, UK.
Simon GatesCancer Research Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Gordon L CarlsonNational Intestinal Failure Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford Care Organisation, Greater Manchester, UK.
Tim WalshAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.
Nazir I LoneAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-2779
Paul R MounceyClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, London, UK.
Mervyn SingerCentre for Intensive Care Medicine, Experimental and Translational Medicine, Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-6350
Peter WilsonClinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tim FeltonRespiratory Academic Group, Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Kay MarshallPharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anower M HossainWarwick Medical School, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Ranjit LallWarwick Medical School, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBImperial College London · GBIntensive Care National Audit & Research Centre · GBLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To describe the protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to determine whether treatment protocols monitoring daily CRP (C-reactive protein) or PCT (procalcitonin) safely allow a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalised adult patients with sepsis. Design: Multicentre three-arm randomised controlled trial. Setting: UK NHS hospitals. Target population: Hospitalised critically ill adults who have been commenced on intravenous antibiotics for sepsis. Health technology: Three protocols for guiding antibiotic discontinuation will be compared: (a) standard care; (b) standard care + daily CRP monitoring; (c) standard care + daily PCT monitoring. Standard care will be based on routine sepsis management and antibiotic stewardship. Measurement of outcomes and costs. Outcomes will be assessed to 28 days. The primary outcomes are total duration of antibiotics and safety outcome of all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: escalation of care/re-admission; infection re-lapse/recurrence; antibiotic dose; length and level of critical care stay and length of hospital stay. Ninety-day all-cause mortality rates will also be collected. An assessment of cost effectiveness will be performed. Conclusion: In the setting of routine NHS care, if this trial finds that a treatment protocol based on monitoring CRP or PCT safely allows a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy, and is cost effective, then this has the potential to change clinical practice for critically ill patients with sepsis. Moreover, if a biomarker-guided protocol is not found to be effective, then it will be important to avoid its use in sepsis and prevent ineffective technology becoming widely adopted in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antibiotic durationbiomarkersC-reactive proteinprocalcitoninsepsis

Identifiers

PMID37841304
PMCPMC10572477
OpenAlexW4367053440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.